Another solution for run «…» trap

And some clarified comments.

Author: AlexDaniel

doc/Language/traps.pod6

@@ -562,15 +562,16 @@ my $y = ‘foo bar’;
 
 my %h = $x => 42, $y => 99;
 say %h«$x»;   # ← WRONG; assumption that $x has no whitespace
-say %h«$y»;   # ← WRONG; this time you can clearly see how wrong it is
+say %h«$y»;   # ← WRONG; splits ‘foo bar’ by whitespace
 say %h«"$y"»; # ← KINDA OK; it works but there is no good reason to do that
 say %h{$y};   # ← RIGHT; this is what should be used
 
 run «touch $x»;        # ← WRONG; assumption that only one file will be created
-run «touch $y»;        # ← WRONG; this time you can clearly see how wrong it is
-run «touch "$y"»;      # ← WRONG; still an error if $y starts with -
+run «touch $y»;        # ← WRONG; will touch file ‘foo’ and ‘bar’
+run «touch "$y"»;      # ← WRONG; better, but has a different issue if $y starts with -
 run «touch -- "$y"»;   # ← KINDA OK; it works but there is no good enough reason to do that
 run ‘touch’, ‘--’, $y; # ← RIGHT; explicit and *always* correct
+run <touch -->, $y;    # ← RIGHT; < > are OK, this is short and correct
 =end code
 
 Basically, C<«»> quoting is only safe to use if you remember to