Reindexes andthen, gets page back refs #2568

Author: JJ

doc/Language/operators.pod6

@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
 
 =SUBTITLE Common Perl 6 infixes, prefixes, postfixes, and more!
 
-See L<Sub|/type/Sub> on how to define operators.
+See L<Sub|/type/Sub> on how to define new operators.
 
 =head1 Operator precedence
 
@@ -2578,7 +2578,7 @@ are based on.
 
 =head1 Loose AND precedence
 
-=head2 infix C«and»
+=head2 infix X<C«and»>
 
 Same as L<infix &&|/language/operators#infix_%26%26>, except with looser
 precedence.
@@ -2587,7 +2587,7 @@ Short-circuits so that it returns the first operand that evaluates to
 C<False>, otherwise returns the last operand. Note that C<and> is easy
 to misuse. See L<traps|/language/traps#Loose_boolean_operators>.
 
-=head2 infix C«andthen» X<|andthen>
+=head2 infix X<C«andthen»>
 
 The C<andthen> operator returns
 L«C<Empty>|/type/Slip#index-entry-Empty-Empty» upon encountering the
@@ -2628,21 +2628,24 @@ behaviour:
     .say with 42;
     42 andthen .say;
 
-=head2 infix C«notandthen»
+=head2 infix X<C«notandthen»>
 
-The X<notandthen> operator returns L«C<Empty>|/type/Slip#index-entry-Empty-Empty» upon encountering
-the first L<defined|/routine/defined> argument, otherwise the last argument.
-Last argument is returned as-is, without being checked for definedness at all.
-Short-circuits. The result of the left side is bound to C<$_> for the
-right side, or passed as arguments if the right side is a
-L«C<Callable>|/type/Callable», whose L<count|/routine/count> must be C<0> or C<1>.
+The C<notandthen> operator returns
+L«C<Empty>|/type/Slip#index-entry-Empty-Empty» upon encountering the first
+L<defined|/routine/defined> argument, otherwise the last argument. Last argument
+is returned as-is, without being checked for definedness at all. Short-circuits.
+The result of the left side is bound to C<$_> for the right side, or passed as
+arguments if the right side is a L«C<Callable>|/type/Callable», whose
+L<count|/routine/count> must be C<0> or C<1>.
 
-At first glance, L<notandthen|/routine/notandthen> might appear to be the same thing as the L<orelse|/routine/orelse>
-operator. The difference is subtle: L<notandthen|/routine/notandthen> returns
+At first glance, L<notandthen|/routine/notandthen> might appear to be the same
+thing as the L<orelse|/routine/orelse> operator. The difference is subtle:
+L<notandthen|/routine/notandthen> returns
 L«C<Empty>|/type/Slip#index-entry-Empty-Empty» when it encounters a
-L<defined|/routine/defined> item (that isn't the last item), whereas L<orelse|/routine/orelse> returns that
-item. In other words, L<notandthen|/routine/notandthen> is a means to act when items aren't
-defined, whereas L<orelse|/routine/orelse> is a means to obtain the first defined item:
+L<defined|/routine/defined> item (that isn't the last item), whereas
+L<orelse|/routine/orelse> returns that item. In other words,
+L<notandthen|/routine/notandthen> is a means to act when items aren't defined,
+whereas L<orelse|/routine/orelse> is a means to obtain the first defined item:
 
 =begin code
 sub all-sensors-down     { [notandthen] |@_, True             }