Reflow and some rephrasing

Author: JJ

doc/Type/Cool.pod6

@@ -1430,11 +1430,12 @@ method EVAL(*%_)
 =for code
 sub EVAL($code where Cool|Blob, :$lang = 'perl6')
 
-If it is invoked as a method, it actually calls the subroutine form with
+If it is invoked as a method, it calls the subroutine form with
 invocant as the first argument, C<$code>, passing along named args, if any; this
-coerces L<Cool|/type/Cool> C<$code> to L<Str|/type/Str>. If C<$code> is a L<Blob|/type/Blob>, it'll be processed
-using the same encoding as the C<$lang> compiler would: for C<perl6> C<$lang>,
-uses C<utf-8>; for C<Perl5>, processes using the same rules as C<perl>.
+coerces L<Cool|/type/Cool> C<$code> to L<Str|/type/Str>. If C<$code> is a
+L<Blob|/type/Blob>, it'll be processed using the same encoding as the C<$lang>
+compiler would: for C<perl6> C<$lang>, uses C<utf-8>; for C<Perl5>, processes
+using the same rules as C<perl>.
 
 This works as-is with a literal string parameter. More complex input,
 such as a variable or string with embedded code, is illegal by default.
@@ -1447,17 +1448,17 @@ This can be overridden in any of several ways:
     # any of the above allows:
     EVAL "say { 5 + 5 }";   # OUTPUT: «10␤»
 
-In case the C<MONKEY-SEE-NO-EVAL> pragma is not activated, the compiler
-will complain with a C<EVAL is a very dangerous function!!!> exception.
-And it is essentially right, since that will run arbitrary code with the
-same permissions as the program. You should take care of cleaning the
-code that is going to pass through EVAL if you activate the
-C<MONKEY-SEE-NO-EVAL> pragma.
+In case the C<MONKEY-SEE-NO-EVAL> pragma is not activated, the compiler will
+complain with a C<EVAL is a very dangerous function!!!> exception. And it is
+essentially right, since that will run arbitrary code with the same permissions
+as the program. You should take care of cleaning the code that is going to pass
+through EVAL if you activate the C<MONKEY-SEE-NO-EVAL> pragma.
 
 Please note that you can interpolate to create routine names using
 quotation, as can be seen in
 L<this example|/language/quoting#index-entry-%26_(interpolation)>
-or  L<other ways to interpolate to create identifier names|/language/syntax#Identifiers>.
+or
+L<other ways to interpolate to create identifier names|/language/syntax#Identifiers>.
 This only works, however, for already declared functions and other
 objects and is thus safer to use.