Fixed erroneous example output and formatting

Author: Jan-Olof Hendig

doc/Type/Signature.pod6

@@ -433,9 +433,9 @@ within the list, but keep the arguments more or less as-is:
     my @array = <a b c>;
     my $list := <d e f>;
     sub b(**@b) { @b.perl.say };
-    b(@array);                 # OUTPUT: «[["a", "b", "c"]]␤»
+    b(@array);                 # OUTPUT: «[["a", "b", "c"],]␤»
     b(1, $list, [2, 3]);       # OUTPUT: «[1, ("d", "e", "f"), [2, 3]]␤»
-    b([1, 2]);                 # OUTPUT: «[[1, 2]]␤»
+    b([1, 2]);                 # OUTPUT: «[[1, 2],]␤»
     b(1, [1, 2], ([3, 4], 5)); # OUTPUT: «[1, [1, 2], ([3, 4], 5)]␤»
     b(($_ for 1, 2, 3));       # OUTPUT: «[(1, 2, 3),]␤»
 
@@ -504,9 +504,9 @@ as the parameters were declared.
 In the case of named arguments and parameters, only the name is used for
 mapping arguments to parameters
 
-    =for code :allow<L>
-    sub named(:$x, :$y) { "x=$x y=$y" }
-    named( y => 5, x => 4);             # RESULT: «x=4 y=5»
+=for code :allow<L>
+sub named(:$x, :$y) { "x=$x y=$y" }
+named( y => 5, x => 4);             # RESULT: «x=4 y=5»
 
 It is possible to have a different name for a named parameter than the
 variable name: