-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Allow configuring endpointIdentificationAlgorithm for jetty SSL #1153
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Looks good, but I would use openjdk9 or even openjdk11 instead of oraclejdk. If it's not possible now, lets create a separate issue/poc... |
@t-jd Hi Tymur, thanks for reviewing. I have addressed your comment; could you please take another look? |
Hi, can we get some traction on this PR please? |
Sorry @huangminchn, this repo is not actively maintained at the moment. |
@huangminchn looks good, but still the build is failed, at least Travis CI says so |
Closed by mistakes. Reopening it. |
@t-jd Hi Tymur, could you please take another look? Thanks! |
Also upgrade jdk from oraclejdk8 to oraclejdk9 (CI complains that "Expected feature release number in range of 9 to 14, but got: 8")
@t-jd Hi Tymur, it would be great if you could take another look. Thanks! |
@huangminchn Looks good 👍 |
Thanks @t-jd ! Could you please approve the PR? https://github.com/perwendel/spark/actions/runs/2694031124 |
@huangminchn I don't see how can I approve this PR. There is no action button to approve, bit only for a specific commit |
@t-jd At the bottom of this PR page, it said "1 workflow awaiting approval". Could you please click on it and approve it? |
@huangminchn, @t-jd is not a maintainer, so he is not able to approve your PR. @perwendel is the main maintainer, and he has been active lately, so hopefully he can approve the run :) |
Good to know that! @perwendel Could you please approve the run? Thanks! |
PR merged into/solved in the unofficial build - Release 2+ |
Thanks @lepe ! Can you help merge it into this repo? Are you planning to release the unofficial build? |
@huangminchn Yes, I have been releasing the unofficial build. To use it:
There should not be any impact in your code (except the dependency). Please take a minute to read which modifications, features and bug fixes are included or the summary of all the pull requests already added. I would be happy to help to merge those changes into this repo, as I don't want to create a divergence. However it doesn't depend on me, as I'm not part of the maintainers team. Meanwhile, I will continue maintaining my branch. You are welcome to help adding new features, PMs or fixing bugs. There are still some things I would like to update:
|
@lepe : my fork use Jetty 11. |
@lepe : I tried to migrate. And this happened: |
Great! Thanks for trying. Checking again, it seems that HTTP/3 was implemented in Jetty 10.0.8/11.0.8. So Jetty 11 should be enough for now. |
No description provided.