You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Is it normal that inserting a single two-column line in a redis_fdw scalar/hash table lasts much longer than in a regular Postgres table (in average 0.6 ms vs 0.06 ms) while ram is nearly free? Almost the same situation with reading. I thought that read/write actions in in-memory database should take less (or equal) time than in Postgres (which is true for direct access) . But benchmarks show opposite!
What can cause such behavior?
My system is Ubuntu 14, Postgres 9.3, Redis 2.8.4
RAM 3GB,
Processor 4 core 2.3 GHz
HDD SATA2 with below average speed
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Is it normal that inserting a single two-column line in a redis_fdw scalar/hash table lasts much longer than in a regular Postgres table (in average 0.6 ms vs 0.06 ms) while ram is nearly free? Almost the same situation with reading. I thought that read/write actions in in-memory database should take less (or equal) time than in Postgres (which is true for direct access) . But benchmarks show opposite!
What can cause such behavior?
My system is Ubuntu 14, Postgres 9.3, Redis 2.8.4
RAM 3GB,
Processor 4 core 2.3 GHz
HDD SATA2 with below average speed
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: