Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add automatic module name to manifest for jdk9+ #1538

Merged
merged 3 commits into from Jul 31, 2019

Conversation

@davecramer
Copy link
Member

@davecramer davecramer commented Jul 31, 2019

No description provided.

@AppVeyorBot
Copy link

@AppVeyorBot AppVeyorBot commented Jul 31, 2019

Loading

@AppVeyorBot
Copy link

@AppVeyorBot AppVeyorBot commented Jul 31, 2019

Loading

@codecov-io
Copy link

@codecov-io codecov-io commented Jul 31, 2019

Codecov Report

Merging #1538 into master will increase coverage by 0.03%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##             master    #1538      +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage     68.91%   68.94%   +0.03%     
- Complexity     3954     3957       +3     
============================================
  Files           179      179              
  Lines         16491    16491              
  Branches       2678     2678              
============================================
+ Hits          11364    11370       +6     
+ Misses         3881     3877       -4     
+ Partials       1246     1244       -2

Loading

@AppVeyorBot
Copy link

@AppVeyorBot AppVeyorBot commented Jul 31, 2019

Loading

@davecramer davecramer merged commit 0600990 into pgjdbc:master Jul 31, 2019
2 of 3 checks passed
Loading
@davecramer davecramer deleted the autmaticmodule branch Jul 31, 2019
davecramer added a commit to davecramer/pgjdbc that referenced this issue Jul 5, 2021
* add automatic module name to manifest for jdk9+
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Linked issues

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants