Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Move TandemEmitter behavior to Emitter (if possible) #18

Closed
samreid opened this issue Feb 6, 2017 · 3 comments
Closed

Move TandemEmitter behavior to Emitter (if possible) #18

samreid opened this issue Feb 6, 2017 · 3 comments

Comments

@samreid
Copy link
Member

samreid commented Feb 6, 2017

We would like to integrate tandem into all core classes, including Emitter. It may not be possible for Emitter, since Emitter may need to include child Emitters as part of its definition. We'll have to see.

See https://github.com/phetsims/phet-io/issues/926

@samreid samreid self-assigned this Feb 6, 2017
samreid added a commit to phetsims/circuit-construction-kit-common that referenced this issue Aug 5, 2017
samreid added a commit to phetsims/energy-skate-park-basics that referenced this issue Aug 5, 2017
samreid added a commit to phetsims/forces-and-motion-basics that referenced this issue Aug 5, 2017
samreid added a commit to phetsims/john-travoltage that referenced this issue Aug 5, 2017
samreid added a commit to phetsims/build-an-atom that referenced this issue Aug 5, 2017
samreid added a commit to phetsims/chipper that referenced this issue Aug 5, 2017
samreid added a commit to phetsims/joist that referenced this issue Aug 5, 2017
samreid added a commit to phetsims/shred that referenced this issue Aug 5, 2017
@samreid
Copy link
Member Author

samreid commented Aug 5, 2017

In the preceding commits @zepumph and I got things working. I'll leave this open and assigned to myself to double check on Bayes after the change, and assigned to @zepumph to double check the changes and see if there's anything else.

@samreid
Copy link
Member Author

samreid commented Aug 5, 2017

Bayes seems OK, @zepumph can you please double check everything?

@samreid samreid removed their assignment Aug 5, 2017
@zepumph
Copy link
Member

zepumph commented Aug 7, 2017

I think everything looks good to me. Thanks for finishing that up. Closing

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants