Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Start hackin a data.ticktools #527

Draft
wants to merge 7 commits into
base: binancial_secs
Choose a base branch
from
Draft

Conversation

goodboy
Copy link
Contributor

@goodboy goodboy commented Jun 27, 2023

As part of devving #526 started formalizing some of tick processing APIs..

More to come including possibly some work toward #107 ?

Since it may be handy to get the latest ticks first, add a `reverse:
bool` to `iterticks()` and add some cleaner logic and a proper doc
string to `frame_ticks()`.
When you look at usage we don't end up really needing clear entries to
be keyed by their `Transaction.tid`, instead it's much more important to
ensure the time sorted order of trade-clearing transactions such that
position properties such as the size and ppu are calculated correctly.
Thus, this instead simplified the `.clears` table to a list of clear
dict entries making a bunch of things simpler:
- object form `Position._clears` compared to the offline TOML schema
  (saved in account files) is now data-structure-symmetrical.
- `Position.add_clear()` now uses `bisect.insort()` to
  datetime-field-sort-insert into the *list* which saves having to worry
  about sorting on every sequence *read*.

Further deats:
- adjust `.accounting._ledger.iter_by_dt()` to expect an input `list`.
- change `Position.iter_clears()` to iterate only the clearing entry
  dicts without yielding a key/tid; no more tuples.
- drop `Position.to_dict()` since parent `Struct` already implements it.
@goodboy goodboy changed the base branch from master to binancial_secs June 27, 2023 19:49
@goodboy goodboy changed the title Rename and add to piker.data.ticktools Start hackin a data.ticktools Jun 27, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant