Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: support get configuration #8

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jul 28, 2024

Conversation

panlei-coder
Copy link
Collaborator

@panlei-coder panlei-coder commented Jul 27, 2024

1、支持通过 log index 来获取对应的成员配置。
2、修复实现 learner 中通过 log index 来获取 learner 配置的 bug。
3、修改 set_self_replay_point 接口名为 set_last_applied_index_and_term。

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced a new method for retrieving configuration entries based on a specified index.
    • Added a new ConfigurationEntry structure to encapsulate configuration details.
  • Improvements

    • Renamed methods to enhance clarity regarding their purpose and functionality, particularly in managing state and configurations.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 27, 2024

Walkthrough

The recent modifications enhance the clarity and functionality of the braft library by renaming methods and introducing new ones. Key changes include the renaming of set_self_playback_point to set_last_applied_index_and_term, emphasizing clarity in its purpose. A new method, get_configuration, has also been added, improving how configuration details are managed and retrieved. These adjustments aim to streamline the codebase for better readability and maintainability.

Changes

Files Change Summary
src/braft/configuration_manager.cpp Modified get_learner_conf to use _learner_snapshot instead of _snapshot, clarifying learner configuration retrieval.
src/braft/fsm_caller.cpp Renamed set_self_playback_point to set_last_applied_index_and_term, improving clarity about its function.
src/braft/fsm_caller.h Updated method signature of set_self_playback_point to set_last_applied_index_and_term, aligning with changes in the implementation file.
src/braft/node.cpp, src/braft/node.h Renamed set_self_playback_point to set_last_applied_index_and_term. Added new method get_configuration for retrieving configuration entries.
src/braft/raft.cpp, src/braft/raft.h Renamed set_self_playback_point to set_last_applied_index_and_term. Introduced get_configuration and declared ConfigurationEntry struct.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant ConfigManager
    participant NodeImpl
    participant FSMCaller
    participant Raft

    ConfigManager->>NodeImpl: get_configuration(index)
    NodeImpl->>Raft: set_last_applied_index_and_term(last_applied_index)
    Raft-->>NodeImpl: Confirmation
    NodeImpl-->>ConfigManager: Configuration details
Loading

Poem

In the code where rabbits play,
Changes hop along the way.
With clearer names and methods bright,
Configuration shines in the light.
Let’s celebrate with leaps and bounds,
For code like gardens, joy abounds! 🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (1)
src/braft/raft.cpp (1)

223-224: Ensure the get_configuration method is tested.

The get_configuration method is integrated into various parts of the codebase, but there are no test cases found to verify its functionality. It is important to add tests to ensure the method works correctly and does not introduce any issues.

  • Add unit tests for get_configuration in relevant test files.
Analysis chain

LGTM! But verify the correctness of the new method.

The addition of the get_configuration method enhances the node's ability to manage different types of peers and their configurations.

However, ensure that the new method is correctly integrated and tested within the codebase.


Let's verify if the get_configuration method is covered by tests.


Let's expand our search to include all files to verify if get_configuration is tested indirectly or in files not matching the *test* pattern.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the integration and testing of the new `get_configuration` method.

# Test: Search for the method usage. Expect: Occurrences of `get_configuration` in tests or related code.
rg --type cpp 'get_configuration'

Length of output: 999


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the presence of test cases for the `get_configuration` method.

# Search for test files that might include `get_configuration` usage.
rg --type cpp 'get_configuration' --glob '*test*'

Length of output: 49


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the presence of test cases for the `get_configuration` method by searching all files.

# Search for `get_configuration` usage across all files to identify any test cases or indirect usage.
rg --type cpp 'get_configuration'

Length of output: 999

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between e883764 and bafac83.

Files selected for processing (7)
  • src/braft/configuration_manager.cpp (2 hunks)
  • src/braft/fsm_caller.cpp (1 hunks)
  • src/braft/fsm_caller.h (1 hunks)
  • src/braft/node.cpp (1 hunks)
  • src/braft/node.h (1 hunks)
  • src/braft/raft.cpp (2 hunks)
  • src/braft/raft.h (2 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (12)
src/braft/configuration_manager.cpp (2)

110-110: LGTM! But verify the correctness of the changes.

The changes to use _learner_snapshot instead of _snapshot are logical and consistent with the goal of improving the retrieval of learner configurations.

However, ensure that all references to _snapshot in the context of learner configurations have been correctly updated to _learner_snapshot.

Verification successful

Verification successful.

The references to _snapshot and _learner_snapshot in configuration_manager.cpp are contextually appropriate and distinct. No further changes are required.

  • src/braft/configuration_manager.cpp: The usages of _snapshot and _learner_snapshot are correct as per their respective contexts.
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify all references to `_snapshot` in the context of learner configurations have been correctly updated to `_learner_snapshot`.

# Test: Search for `_snapshot` usage. Expect: No occurrences in the context of learner configurations.
rg --type cpp '_snapshot'

Length of output: 40319


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Extract context around the usage of `_snapshot` in `configuration_manager.cpp` to verify if they should be `_learner_snapshot`.

# Extracting 10 lines of context around each occurrence of `_snapshot` in `configuration_manager.cpp`
rg --type cpp '_snapshot' -A 10 -B 10 src/braft/configuration_manager.cpp

Length of output: 2242


99-100: LGTM! But verify the correctness of the changes.

The changes to use _learner_snapshot instead of _snapshot are logical and consistent with the goal of improving the retrieval of learner configurations.

However, ensure that all references to _snapshot in the context of learner configurations have been correctly updated to _learner_snapshot.

Verification successful

Ensure the correctness of _snapshot and _learner_snapshot usage.

The output indicates multiple references to _snapshot and _learner_snapshot. Verify that their usage in src/braft/configuration_manager.cpp is correct and consistent.


Verified: The changes to use _learner_snapshot instead of _snapshot in the context of learner configurations are correct and consistent.

The methods in src/braft/configuration_manager.cpp show that _snapshot and _learner_snapshot are used in appropriate contexts, ensuring logical consistency.

  • set_snapshot
  • get
  • get_learner_conf
  • last_configuration
  • last_learner_configuration
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify all references to `_snapshot` in the context of learner configurations have been correctly updated to `_learner_snapshot`.

# Test: Search for `_snapshot` usage. Expect: No occurrences in the context of learner configurations.
rg --type cpp '_snapshot'

Length of output: 40319


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Extract the relevant method implementations and usages of `_snapshot` and `_learner_snapshot` in `src/braft/configuration_manager.cpp`.

# Extract methods containing `_snapshot` and `_learner_snapshot`
ast-grep --lang cpp --pattern $'$_ $_::$_() {
  $$$
  $_snapshot
  $$$
}' src/braft/configuration_manager.cpp

ast-grep --lang cpp --pattern $'$_ $_::$_() {
  $$$
  $_learner_snapshot
  $$$
}' src/braft/configuration_manager.cpp

Length of output: 229


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Refined search patterns to extract relevant methods and usages of `_snapshot` and `_learner_snapshot` in `src/braft/configuration_manager.cpp`.

# Search for methods containing `_snapshot`
rg --type cpp '_snapshot' -A 10 src/braft/configuration_manager.cpp

# Search for methods containing `_learner_snapshot`
rg --type cpp '_learner_snapshot' -A 10 src/braft/configuration_manager.cpp

Length of output: 3095

src/braft/fsm_caller.h (1)

123-123: LGTM! But verify the correctness of the changes.

The renaming of the method to set_last_applied_index_and_term improves clarity and aligns the method name with its functionality.

However, ensure that all references to set_self_playback_point have been correctly updated to set_last_applied_index_and_term.

Verification successful

Verification successful!

The method set_self_playback_point has been correctly renamed to set_last_applied_index_and_term across the codebase. The new method name is consistently used in multiple relevant files.

  • src/braft/raft.cpp
  • src/braft/raft.h
  • src/braft/fsm_caller.h
  • src/braft/node.cpp
  • src/braft/fsm_caller.cpp
  • src/braft/node.h
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify all references to `set_self_playback_point` have been correctly updated to `set_last_applied_index_and_term`.

# Test: Search for the old method name. Expect: No occurrences of `set_self_playback_point`.
rg --type cpp 'set_self_playback_point'

Length of output: 39


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the usage of the new method name `set_last_applied_index_and_term`.

# Test: Search for the new method name. Expect: Occurrences of `set_last_applied_index_and_term`.
rg --type cpp 'set_last_applied_index_and_term'

Length of output: 777

src/braft/raft.cpp (1)

219-221: LGTM! But verify the correctness of the changes.

The renaming of the method to set_last_applied_index_and_term improves clarity and aligns the method name with its functionality.

However, ensure that all references to set_self_playback_point have been correctly updated to set_last_applied_index_and_term.

Verification successful

Verification Successful!

All references to set_self_playback_point have been correctly updated to set_last_applied_index_and_term.

  • src/braft/raft.h
  • src/braft/node.h
  • src/braft/raft.cpp
  • src/braft/fsm_caller.h
  • src/braft/node.cpp
  • src/braft/fsm_caller.cpp
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify all references to `set_self_playback_point` have been correctly updated to `set_last_applied_index_and_term`.

# Test: Search for the old method name. Expect: No occurrences of `set_self_playback_point`.
rg --type cpp 'set_self_playback_point'

Length of output: 39


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify all references to `set_last_applied_index_and_term` are correctly updated.

# Test: Search for the new method name. Expect: Occurrences of `set_last_applied_index_and_term`.
rg --type cpp 'set_last_applied_index_and_term'

Length of output: 777

src/braft/node.h (2)

148-149: LGTM!

The method name change from set_self_playback_point to set_last_applied_index_and_term improves clarity regarding its functionality.


150-151: LGTM!

The new method get_configuration enhances the configuration management capabilities of the Node class by allowing retrieval of configuration details based on a log index.

src/braft/fsm_caller.cpp (1)

564-567: LGTM!

The method name change from set_self_playback_point to set_last_applied_index_and_term improves clarity regarding its functionality.

src/braft/raft.h (3)

48-48: LGTM!

The new struct ConfigurationEntry likely encapsulates configuration details related to the Raft consensus algorithm, enhancing the handling of configuration data.


728-729: LGTM!

The method name change from set_self_playback_point to set_last_applied_index_and_term improves clarity regarding its functionality.


730-731: LGTM!

The new method get_configuration enhances the configuration management capabilities of the Node class by allowing retrieval of configuration details based on a log index.

src/braft/node.cpp (2)

982-989: LGTM! But verify the function usage in the codebase.

The code changes are approved.

However, ensure that all function calls to set_last_applied_index_and_term match the new signature.

Verification successful

Verified: The function set_last_applied_index_and_term is used correctly with the new signature across the codebase.

The function is consistently defined and called with the correct signature in the following files:

  • src/braft/node.cpp
  • src/braft/fsm_caller.cpp
  • src/braft/raft.cpp
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify all function calls to `set_last_applied_index_and_term` match the new signature.

# Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new signature.
rg --type cpp -A 5 $'set_last_applied_index_and_term'

Length of output: 2692


991-998: LGTM! But verify the function usage in the codebase.

The code changes are approved.

However, ensure that all function calls to get_configuration are correctly implemented.

Verification successful

LGTM! But verify the function usage in the codebase.

The code changes are approved.

The function get_configuration is correctly implemented and used in the codebase. No issues were found.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify all function calls to `get_configuration` are correctly implemented.

# Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Correct usage of the function.
rg --type cpp -A 5 $'get_configuration'

Length of output: 2802


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Gather more context around the function calls to `get_configuration`.

# Search for the function usage with additional context lines to ensure correct implementation.
rg --type cpp -A 10 -B 10 $'get_configuration'

Length of output: 8575

@AlexStocks AlexStocks merged commit d418835 into pikiwidb:master Jul 28, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants