-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 153
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add rfc for k8s multi cluster deployment #5069
Conversation
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #5069 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 22.82% 22.81% -0.01%
==========================================
Files 409 409
Lines 43338 43338
==========================================
- Hits 9891 9889 -2
- Misses 32668 32671 +3
+ Partials 779 778 -1 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
71522ab
to
668b2c4
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What a great rfc 💯
Some nits.
# Usecase | ||
- case 1. When applying the same manifest to multiple clusters for redundant configuration | ||
- case 2. When applying manifest with some patches applied to multiple clusters for redundant configuration | ||
- case 3. Blue/Green Deployment acress the clusters |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
[nits]
- case 3. Blue/Green Deployment acress the clusters | |
- case 3. Blue/Green Deployment across clusters |
### Register Application with multiple platform providers | ||
|
||
On the application register part, we can choose multiple platform providers. | ||
At first, user add the first platform provider. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
At first, user add the first platform provider. | |
At first, a user adds the first platform provider. |
|
||
![image](assets/0014-choose-multiple-providers.png) | ||
|
||
Also, we can can the list of platform providers on the piped list page to verify the platform providers. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
[nits] plz correct the verb.
Also, we can can the list of platform providers on the piped list page to verify the platform providers. | |
Also, we can xxx the list of platform providers on the piped list page to verify the platform providers. |
- K8S_BASELINE_CLEAN | ||
- K8S_TRAFFIC_ROUTING | ||
|
||
### How to check the stage progress of each platform providers in the deployment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
### How to check the stage progress of each platform providers in the deployment | |
### How to check the stage progress of each platform provider in the deployment |
|
||
- Rollback時 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
these lines should be removed??
- Rollback時 |
ceadcab
to
7983df8
Compare
@t-kikuc Thank you for the verbal comment! I fixed them 🙏 |
Signed-off-by: Yoshiki Fujikane <ffjlabo@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Yoshiki Fujikane <ffjlabo@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Yoshiki Fujikane <ffjlabo@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Yoshiki Fujikane <ffjlabo@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Yoshiki Fujikane <ffjlabo@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Yoshiki Fujikane <ffjlabo@gmail.com>
7983df8
to
4ad31cd
Compare
What this PR does / why we need it:
as title
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Part of #5006
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?: