Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add rfc for k8s multi cluster deployment #5069

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Aug 9, 2024

Conversation

ffjlabo
Copy link
Member

@ffjlabo ffjlabo commented Jul 24, 2024

What this PR does / why we need it:

as title

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Part of #5006

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?:

  • How are users affected by this change:
  • Is this breaking change:
  • How to migrate (if breaking change):

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 24, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 22.81%. Comparing base (915a632) to head (4ad31cd).
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #5069      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   22.82%   22.81%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         409      409              
  Lines       43338    43338              
==========================================
- Hits         9891     9889       -2     
- Misses      32668    32671       +3     
+ Partials      779      778       -1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@ffjlabo ffjlabo force-pushed the add-rfc-for-multi-cluster-deploy branch from 71522ab to 668b2c4 Compare July 29, 2024 10:02
@ffjlabo ffjlabo marked this pull request as ready for review July 30, 2024 05:17
Copy link
Member

@t-kikuc t-kikuc left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What a great rfc 💯

Some nits.

# Usecase
- case 1. When applying the same manifest to multiple clusters for redundant configuration
- case 2. When applying manifest with some patches applied to multiple clusters for redundant configuration
- case 3. Blue/Green Deployment acress the clusters
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

[nits]

Suggested change
- case 3. Blue/Green Deployment acress the clusters
- case 3. Blue/Green Deployment across clusters

### Register Application with multiple platform providers

On the application register part, we can choose multiple platform providers.
At first, user add the first platform provider.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
At first, user add the first platform provider.
At first, a user adds the first platform provider.


![image](assets/0014-choose-multiple-providers.png)

Also, we can can the list of platform providers on the piped list page to verify the platform providers.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

[nits] plz correct the verb.

Suggested change
Also, we can can the list of platform providers on the piped list page to verify the platform providers.
Also, we can xxx the list of platform providers on the piped list page to verify the platform providers.

- K8S_BASELINE_CLEAN
- K8S_TRAFFIC_ROUTING

### How to check the stage progress of each platform providers in the deployment
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
### How to check the stage progress of each platform providers in the deployment
### How to check the stage progress of each platform provider in the deployment

Comment on lines 319 to 320

- Rollback時
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

these lines should be removed??

Suggested change
- Rollback時

@ffjlabo ffjlabo force-pushed the add-rfc-for-multi-cluster-deploy branch from ceadcab to 7983df8 Compare July 30, 2024 06:28
@ffjlabo
Copy link
Member Author

ffjlabo commented Jul 30, 2024

@t-kikuc Thank you for the verbal comment! I fixed them 🙏

Signed-off-by: Yoshiki Fujikane <ffjlabo@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Yoshiki Fujikane <ffjlabo@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Yoshiki Fujikane <ffjlabo@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Yoshiki Fujikane <ffjlabo@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Yoshiki Fujikane <ffjlabo@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Yoshiki Fujikane <ffjlabo@gmail.com>
@ffjlabo ffjlabo force-pushed the add-rfc-for-multi-cluster-deploy branch from 7983df8 to 4ad31cd Compare July 30, 2024 06:50
@ffjlabo ffjlabo requested a review from t-kikuc July 31, 2024 02:06
@ffjlabo ffjlabo merged commit 58bf4ff into master Aug 9, 2024
18 checks passed
@ffjlabo ffjlabo deleted the add-rfc-for-multi-cluster-deploy branch August 9, 2024 06:57
This was referenced Aug 13, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot mentioned this pull request Aug 26, 2024
This was referenced Sep 3, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants