You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
What is the logic behind committing new releases with random order regarding the tag versions?
For example, days ago there was a commit with the tag v270.0.0 and now the latest commit has lower "version" v267.3.0. Based on time one may assume (has listed also here: https://github.com/pivotal-cf/cf-rabbitmq-release/releases looks like the latest stable is v267.3.0 but then what is the point of v270.0.0
Probably would be better to have different branches for "possible test" but in any case, I would highly suggest to please keep a healthy sequence in the tags
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
We have created an issue in Pivotal Tracker to manage this. Unfortunately, the Pivotal Tracker project is private so you may be unable to view the contents of the story.
The labels on this github issue will be updated when the story is started.
Hi, our pipeline ran into some issues recently when we started automating our release process, releasing with every successful build. While some of the problems are due to fundamental structural problems that we have not yet found a way to overcome, we've hopefully fixed the most recent releases. Our apologies for the issue, it impacted us as well.
What is the logic behind committing new releases with random order regarding the tag versions?
For example, days ago there was a commit with the tag
v270.0.0
and now the latest commit has lower "version"v267.3.0
. Based on time one may assume (has listed also here: https://github.com/pivotal-cf/cf-rabbitmq-release/releases looks like the latest stable isv267.3.0
but then what is the point ofv270.0.0
Probably would be better to have different branches for "possible test" but in any case, I would highly suggest to please keep a healthy sequence in the tags
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: