Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Extra Label Size #27

Closed
i6media opened this issue Nov 22, 2017 · 4 comments
Closed

Extra Label Size #27

i6media opened this issue Nov 22, 2017 · 4 comments

Comments

@i6media
Copy link

i6media commented Nov 22, 2017

Hi,

Thanks for your awesome package, works like a charm!

There is however one thing, we've purchased a Brother QL-1060N, with address labels. The format looks like it's 102x152 mm, but it is 102x153 mm.

That means it flashes red when printing in the 102x152 format.

We've modified devicedependent.py ourselves, and added the extra label size, however if other people experience the same problem, permanent implementation in the repository would be great:

"102x153":{'tape_size': (102, 153), 'dots_total': (1200, 1804), 'dots_printable': (1164, 1660), 'right_margin_dots': 12, 'feed_margin': 0},

Keep up the good work!

@pklaus
Copy link
Owner

pklaus commented Nov 23, 2017

Great, thanks for this report. I'm happy someone can confirm the QL-1060N to work.
So printing works nicely with the added line? Did you try any other label sizes, too?

@i6media
Copy link
Author

i6media commented Nov 23, 2017

I didn't try other formats, but I did investigate some more:

Even on the cardboard package (Brother DK-11241) it says 102x152mm Address Label, however on the printer verbose log it says 'currently installed: 102x153mm'.

With the added line on devicedependent.py it works like a charm.

@pklaus
Copy link
Owner

pklaus commented Nov 23, 2017

Good, thanks for letting me know.

If Brother is advertising it that way, I think I should change the label specification line to state 'tape_size': (102, 153), but leave the label identifier (for the command line) as 102x152.

@pklaus pklaus closed this as completed in e5d4fde Jan 6, 2018
@pklaus
Copy link
Owner

pklaus commented Jan 6, 2018

Commit e5d4fde should fix this issue. I kept the previous label-size identifier "102x152". Behind the scenes, however, the package is now using the 102x153 info. Thanks for reporting this!

Lynnaut pushed a commit to Lynnaut/brother_ql2 that referenced this issue Jan 17, 2023
fuzeman pushed a commit to fuzeman/brother-label that referenced this issue Aug 31, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants