Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

bridge: fix shutdown of not running bridge #453

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 26, 2024

Conversation

jkralik
Copy link
Member

@jkralik jkralik commented Mar 26, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Refactor
    • Improved synchronization mechanism in service handling for enhanced performance and reliability.
    • Updated network struct for better control and management of goroutines.
    • Enhanced synchronization in device management for improved efficiency.
    • Updated device struct with atomic operations for better synchronization.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Mar 26, 2024

Warning

Rate Limit Exceeded

@jkralik has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 20 minutes and 8 seconds before requesting another review.

How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.
Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.
Please see our FAQ for further information.

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6b5300f and 7373ae7.

Walkthrough

The update introduces significant synchronization changes in both the Service and Net structs. The shift to using sync.WaitGroup in place of channels enhances control over goroutine execution and simplifies synchronization mechanisms, potentially improving code efficiency and readability.

Changes

File Change Summary
.../service/service.go Updated synchronization in the Service struct to use sync.WaitGroup instead of a channel.
.../net/network.go Added atomic.Bool field and sync.WaitGroup in the Net struct. Modified New, Serve, and Close methods for improved synchronization.

🐇💻
In the land of code, where logic threads weave,
A rabbit hopped in, changes up its sleeve.
Channels now gone, a WaitGroup to keep,
Tasks counted with care, no more to reap.
Synced and serene, errors take a leap,
Code dances gracefully, in promises deep.
🌟🚀

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit-tests for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit tests for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit tests.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • The JSON schema for the configuration file is available here.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/coderabbit-overrides.v2.json

CodeRabbit Discord Community

Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review Status

Actionable comments generated: 0

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6b5300f and ac82beb.
Files selected for processing (1)
  • bridge/service/service.go (5 hunks)
Additional comments: 3
bridge/service/service.go (3)
  • 70-70: The addition of sync.WaitGroup to the Service struct is correctly implemented and aligns with the objective of enhancing the shutdown process synchronization.
  • 158-159: The modifications to the Serve method, incorporating wg.Add(1) and defer c.wg.Done(), are correctly implemented and enhance the synchronization mechanism as intended.
  • 168-168: The update to the Shutdown method to use c.wg.Wait() for waiting on goroutines to finish is correctly implemented. However, consider adding error handling for the device closure process to ensure that any errors encountered during device shutdown are appropriately managed.

@jkralik jkralik force-pushed the jkralik/fix/bridge-shutdown branch from ac82beb to 173d428 Compare March 26, 2024 14:30
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review Status

Actionable comments generated: 0

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6b5300f and 173d428.
Files selected for processing (2)
  • bridge/net/network.go (4 hunks)
  • bridge/service/service.go (5 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • bridge/service/service.go
Additional comments: 4
bridge/net/network.go (4)
  • 57-58: The addition of stopped and wg fields to the Net struct is a good practice for managing the lifecycle and concurrency of the network service. However, it's important to ensure that these new mechanisms are used consistently throughout the code to prevent race conditions or deadlocks.
  • 362-364: The goroutine started in the New function for managing cache expirations is correctly synchronized with the sync.WaitGroup. This ensures that the service can wait for this goroutine to finish during shutdown, which is a good practice for clean resource management.
  • 424-426: Checking if the service has already been stopped at the beginning of the Serve method is a good practice. It prevents the service from starting if it's already in a stopped state, which can help avoid unexpected behavior.
  • 455-459: The Close method correctly uses CompareAndSwap to ensure that the service is only stopped once. This atomic operation prevents concurrent calls to Close from interfering with each other. Additionally, waiting for all goroutines to finish before closing the servers is a good practice for clean shutdowns.

@jkralik jkralik force-pushed the jkralik/fix/bridge-shutdown branch from 173d428 to c426eff Compare March 26, 2024 14:50
@jkralik jkralik force-pushed the jkralik/fix/bridge-shutdown branch from c426eff to 7373ae7 Compare March 26, 2024 14:52
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review Status

Actionable comments generated: 0

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6b5300f and c426eff.
Files selected for processing (4)
  • bridge/device/cloud/manager.go (3 hunks)
  • bridge/device/device.go (4 hunks)
  • bridge/net/network.go (4 hunks)
  • bridge/service/service.go (5 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
  • bridge/net/network.go
  • bridge/service/service.go
Additional comments: 4
bridge/device/device.go (2)
  • 26-26: The use of sync/atomic for the stopped field is valid and achieves the intended functionality of preventing multiple closures of the Device. However, for simplicity and more idiomatic Go code, consider using atomic.Bool from the go.uber.org/atomic package for boolean flags.

Also applies to: 73-73

  • 298-306: > 📝 NOTE

This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [301-314]

The modifications to the Close method correctly use the stopped atomic boolean to ensure that the method's logic is executed only once. This is an effective way to prevent potential race conditions or redundant operations during shutdown.

bridge/device/cloud/manager.go (2)
  • 28-28: The use of sync/atomic for the stopped field is valid and achieves the intended functionality of preventing multiple closures of the Manager. However, for simplicity and more idiomatic Go code, consider using atomic.Bool from the go.uber.org/atomic package for boolean flags.

Also applies to: 100-100

  • 534-537: The modifications to the Close method correctly use the stopped atomic boolean to ensure that the method's logic is executed only once. This is an effective way to prevent potential race conditions or redundant operations during shutdown.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Mar 26, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 64.70588% with 6 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 76.87%. Comparing base (6b5300f) to head (7373ae7).

Files Patch % Lines
bridge/device/cloud/manager.go 33.33% 1 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
bridge/device/device.go 33.33% 1 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
bridge/net/network.go 75.00% 1 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #453      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   76.81%   76.87%   +0.05%     
==========================================
  Files         115      115              
  Lines        6702     6710       +8     
==========================================
+ Hits         5148     5158      +10     
+ Misses       1015     1013       -2     
  Partials      539      539              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented Mar 26, 2024

@jkralik jkralik merged commit af7fc65 into main Mar 26, 2024
14 checks passed
@jkralik jkralik deleted the jkralik/fix/bridge-shutdown branch March 26, 2024 16:11
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants