Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Signing key in secret #66

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Mar 28, 2020
Merged

Conversation

tgomas
Copy link
Contributor

@tgomas tgomas commented Mar 3, 2020

Here is a proposition to add a proxy.signingKey parameter which is stored in the secret.

close #65

@CLAassistant
Copy link

CLAassistant commented Mar 3, 2020

CLA assistant check
All committers have signed the CLA.

@tgomas tgomas force-pushed the signing-key-secret branch 5 times, most recently from d5a32eb to 979501e Compare March 3, 2020 13:58
@tgomas tgomas force-pushed the signing-key-secret branch 3 times, most recently from 7bfc092 to 02597e4 Compare March 16, 2020 14:49
@tgomas tgomas force-pushed the signing-key-secret branch 2 times, most recently from bf25e0b to 9ea4dbc Compare March 16, 2020 16:54
Signed-off-by: Thomas Sontheimer <tgomas@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Sontheimer <tgomas@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Sontheimer <tgomas@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Sontheimer <tgomas@users.noreply.github.com>
@tgomas
Copy link
Contributor Author

tgomas commented Mar 25, 2020

@travisgroth all comments have been processed: signing-key can be generated at install and is stored in a dedicated secret. Could you please help me to get it merged ? I'm still open to improve it if you have any additional comment.

@travisgroth travisgroth self-assigned this Mar 26, 2020
Copy link
Contributor

@travisgroth travisgroth left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🎉 LGTM

@travisgroth travisgroth merged commit 80ae533 into pomerium:master Mar 28, 2020
@travisgroth
Copy link
Contributor

@tgomas FYI, I had to unpublish 6.0.5 as this does actually cause a breaking change to existing charts. I'm going to re-release as 7.0.0. That's my mistake for not catching it.

I will also add instructions similar to what we had for the 5.x release https://github.com/pomerium/pomerium-helm/tree/master/charts/pomerium#500-1.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Setting SIGNING_KEY in the secret
5 participants