Make ActivePowerControl extension and its adder public #1191
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…public Signed-off-by: Mathieu BAGUE <mathieu.bague@rte-france.com>
miovd
approved these changes
Feb 28, 2020
|
Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!
|
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Please check if the PR fulfills these requirements (please use
'[x]'to check the checkboxes, or submit the PR and then click the checkboxes)Does this PR already have an issue describing the problem ? If so, link to this issue using
'#XXX'and skip the restN/A
What kind of change does this PR introduce? (Bug fix, feature, docs update, ...)
Bug fix
What is the current behavior? (You can also link to an open issue here)
It's not possible to add ActivePowerControl extension via the new API because the adder is private package. (#1165)
What is the new behavior (if this is a feature change)?
It's now possible to use this extension.
Does this PR introduce a breaking change or deprecate an API? If yes, check the following:
Other information:
I also remove the extra public in the interface of the XNode class
(if any of the questions/checkboxes don't apply, please delete them entirely)