You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Problem:
When using macro-domain decomposition each MPI rank is given a bounding box, which is passed to preCICE to obtain coordinates of coupled points contained therein. If such a coupled macro-point lies on the boundary between two bounding boxes it will be included in both and the Micro Manager currently creates a micro simulation for both duplicates of the macro-point and passes their output to preCICE.
preCICE interprets this as two contributions to the participant's solution and accumulates them, producing incorrect results.
duplicate micro simulations receive identical macro-data and with no/global adaptivity identical output, wasting computational effort
with local adaptivity the two micro-simulations may have different associated active simulations and produce different outputs (differences should be minor if similarity measure is not overly generous)
Suggestion:
The Micro Manager should eliminate duplicate micro simulations to save computational time and avoid incorrect data being received by the macro simulation.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Problem:
When using macro-domain decomposition each MPI rank is given a bounding box, which is passed to preCICE to obtain coordinates of coupled points contained therein. If such a coupled macro-point lies on the boundary between two bounding boxes it will be included in both and the Micro Manager currently creates a micro simulation for both duplicates of the macro-point and passes their output to preCICE.
Suggestion:
The Micro Manager should eliminate duplicate micro simulations to save computational time and avoid incorrect data being received by the macro simulation.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: