Possible issue in eq 36.115

[Duane321]

Edition: 2023-04-01, Advanced Topics

I could merely be confused, but it seems there is a mismatch between the equations in red:

Shouldn't p(a) appear in 36.115? It seems like we might be trying to accomplish that with 1/|A|, but I don't believe 1/|A| = p(a)

[murphyk]

I'm not sure. I'll ask @vveitch

[vveitch]

Yes, this is a typo. (There should be a hat{p}(a) in the estimator in the same position as p(a) in the estimand). I'll fix it tonight.

[murphyk]

Hi @vveitch .I'm currently doing a pass of bug fixes, I will check in the source latex by EOD, please ping me before pulling :)

[vveitch]

in that case, I'll just do tomorrow morning :)

…

On Mon, Aug 14, 2023 at 2:49 PM Kevin P Murphy ***@***.***> wrote: Hi @vveitch <https://github.com/vveitch> .I'm currently doing a pass of bug fixes, I will check in the source latex by EOD, please ping me before pulling :) — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#275 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABZZFQWPWHN3EOKSPD773DDXVJ6K3ANCNFSM6AAAAAA22JBZCQ> . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: ***@***.***>

[murphyk]

I just committed all the changes. Please check your email for some more context :)

[murphyk]

fixed