Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Expose rs-matter's lib as matter_rs #108

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

MabezDev
Copy link

@MabezDev MabezDev commented Oct 2, 2023

Then s/rs-matter::/matter_rs::/g.

Whilst we can't have the crates.io name, we can still have the library name if we want.

I'm not that bothered either way, but I thought I'd open it as a suggestion.

@CLAassistant
Copy link

CLAassistant commented Oct 2, 2023

CLA assistant check
All committers have signed the CLA.

Then `s/rs-matter::/matter_rs::/g`.
@ivmarkov
Copy link
Contributor

ivmarkov commented Oct 2, 2023

I personally find the crate name different from the lib really, really confusing.

That's why we changed the name of the lib to rs_matter in the first place. At least everything is the same everywhere - crates.io, lib name, workspace name, macro-crate name (the latter is suffixed of course).

@ivmarkov
Copy link
Contributor

ivmarkov commented Oct 2, 2023

... and there is already a crate named matter-rs and its lib name (if it ever appears will also be `matter_rs). Confusing, confusing...

@ivmarkov ivmarkov mentioned this pull request Oct 6, 2023
@kedars
Copy link
Collaborator

kedars commented Oct 7, 2023

As discussed in the meeting, opting to keep the same name for the crate and the library, closing this...

@kedars kedars closed this Oct 7, 2023
@MabezDev MabezDev deleted the expose-as-matter-rs branch October 9, 2023 08:48
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants