Testing using AX_HAVE_QT for configuring Qt compilation #167
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Local build is successful. |
revmischa
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 16, 2019
* Testing using AX_HAVE_QT for configuring Qt compilation instead of pkg-config * cleanup * get RCC too * try MOC without CXXFLAGS? * need qt5-default package * readme, unfuck pulseaudio compile * already have ax_have_qt.m4 * fixes to add RCC to ax_have_qt
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Using autoconf extension for checking for Qt5 instead of pkg-config
Please test and tell me if it works
It makes travis unhappy for unknown reasons - travis thinks Qt isn't installed ???
Apparently everyone's Qt5 setup is totally different