Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

GDB Refactor [3/N]: Split android into lib/ and gdblib/ #1119

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 5, 2022

Conversation

gsingh93
Copy link
Member

@gsingh93 gsingh93 commented Sep 5, 2022

No description provided.

@gsingh93 gsingh93 changed the title Split android into lib/ and gdblib/ GDB Refactor [3/N]: Split android into lib/ and gdblib/ Sep 5, 2022
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Sep 5, 2022

Codecov Report

Merging #1119 (3125995) into dev (b7ddf3a) will increase coverage by 0.00%.
The diff coverage is 50.00%.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##              dev    #1119   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   50.22%   50.22%           
=======================================
  Files         169      169           
  Lines       19875    19871    -4     
  Branches     1814     1814           
=======================================
- Hits         9982     9980    -2     
+ Misses       9556     9554    -2     
  Partials      337      337           
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
pwndbg/commands/procinfo.py 24.61% <0.00%> (ø)
pwndbg/lib/android.py 0.00% <ø> (ø)
pwndbg/symbol.py 41.62% <33.33%> (+0.31%) ⬆️
pwndbg/gdblib/android.py 58.33% <58.33%> (ø)
pwndbg/__init__.py 95.09% <100.00%> (ø)

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

@disconnect3d disconnect3d marked this pull request as ready for review September 5, 2022 13:56
@disconnect3d disconnect3d merged commit 36aa539 into pwndbg:dev Sep 5, 2022
@gsingh93 gsingh93 deleted the split-android branch September 9, 2022 00:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants