Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

auto identify the effect modifier columns for `effect' method for EconML estimators #1061

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 27, 2023

Conversation

amit-sharma
Copy link
Member

Fixes #1038.

In v0.10, the user is expected to provide only the effect modifiers columns, which can cause issues if the order of effect modifiers is not correct.
So we revert to v0.8 behavior where the user is only expected to pass the dataframe.

Signed-off-by: Amit Sharma <amit_sharma@live.com>
Signed-off-by: Amit Sharma <amit_sharma@live.com>
@amit-sharma amit-sharma merged commit 4fd0a92 into main Nov 27, 2023
30 checks passed
@amit-sharma amit-sharma deleted the econml-test-prediction-fix branch November 27, 2023 09:10
bloebp pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 28, 2023
…nML estimators (#1061)

* auto identify the effect modifier columns

Signed-off-by: Amit Sharma <amit_sharma@live.com>

* fixed formatting errors

Signed-off-by: Amit Sharma <amit_sharma@live.com>

---------

Signed-off-by: Amit Sharma <amit_sharma@live.com>
@AlxndrMlk
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @amit-sharma @bloebp is this fix available in DoWhy 0.11.1?

@amit-sharma
Copy link
Member Author

yes, it is available in 0.11.1

@AlxndrMlk
Copy link
Contributor

Great news, thanks for the update @amit-sharma

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Unexpected results for CATE methods when predicting on new data
3 participants