feat: add action keybinding info over tooltip

[dalthviz]

Closes #216
Related to napari/napari#7133

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (b7cd0d5) to head (3447e25).
Report is 3 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##              main      #218   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files           31        31           
  Lines         1871      1875    +4     
=========================================
+ Hits          1871      1875    +4     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[tlambert03]

with this pattern, is there any way for someone to opt out of this behavior? For example, if they wish to set their own tooltip (sans suffix). What do you think about simply calling self.setToolTip with the text and the shortcut suffix in __init__ (and then later calls to setToolTip() would override it). ... or some other method that makes it opt-out-able

[dalthviz]

Oh I see, maybe I overdid a little bit here trying to implement a way to always show the keybinding 😅 Will simplify things then 👍

Also, regardless of the simplification. could it make sense to add over the Action definition a field like the one for CommandRule definition for the icon visibility?

app-model/src/app_model/types/_command_rule.py

Lines 61 to 65 in 4afa6f6

	icon_visible_in_menu: bool = Field(
	True,
	description="Whether to show the icon in menus (for backends that support it). "
	"If `False`, only the title will be shown. By default, `True`.",
	)

So something like keybinding_visible_in_tooltip and make its default value False?

[tlambert03]

i think i'd prefer not to have that sort of "view-specific" setting in the model itself.

[DragaDoncila]

@tlambert03 I think your comments have been addressed if you wouldn't mind taking another look at this PR?

[tlambert03]

thanks!