Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Emit assignment-from-none for builtin methods like dict.update() #8809

Merged

Conversation

jacobtylerwalls
Copy link
Member

Type of Changes

Type
βœ“ πŸ› Bug fix

Description

Closes #8714

@jacobtylerwalls jacobtylerwalls added the False Negative πŸ¦‹ No message is emitted but something is wrong with the code label Jul 1, 2023
@jacobtylerwalls jacobtylerwalls added this to the 3.0.0a7 milestone Jul 1, 2023
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 1, 2023

Codecov Report

Merging #8809 (69dac2d) into main (1da5183) will increase coverage by 0.00%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #8809   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   95.89%   95.89%           
=======================================
  Files         173      173           
  Lines       18510    18511    +1     
=======================================
+ Hits        17750    17751    +1     
  Misses        760      760           
Impacted Files Coverage Ξ”
pylint/checkers/typecheck.py 96.46% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️

@github-actions

This comment has been minimized.

@jacobtylerwalls jacobtylerwalls enabled auto-merge (squash) July 1, 2023 15:38
@jacobtylerwalls jacobtylerwalls merged commit 32effc5 into pylint-dev:main Jul 1, 2023
@jacobtylerwalls jacobtylerwalls deleted the assignment-from-none branch July 1, 2023 16:02
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jul 1, 2023

πŸ€– According to the primer, this change has no effect on the checked open source code. πŸ€–πŸŽ‰

This comment was generated for commit 69dac2d

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
False Negative πŸ¦‹ No message is emitted but something is wrong with the code
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

False negative assigned-from-none for value = dict.update({}, {})
2 participants