-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 120
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Accept os.PathLike in addition to str for paths in public API #392
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
14 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
c5fa981
Accept os.PathLike in addition to str for paths in public API; closes…
bfgray3 5147632
update CHANGELOG
bfgray3 aecafd8
add note about parameter rename to CHANGELOG
bfgray3 1f2c913
Path = Union[str, os.PathLike[str]]
bfgray3 e5789d9
Path -> PathType and use in __main__.py
bfgray3 db2b1a9
build.PathType in util.py
bfgray3 2dab6c1
add pr number to CHANGELOG
bfgray3 8d84257
remoev unused import
bfgray3 1465f49
quote os.PathLike[str]
bfgray3 85aefa8
two backticks instead of one in CHANGELOG
bfgray3 09672c4
fix PR link in CHANGELOG
bfgray3 bf3faf7
reformat CHANGELOG
bfgray3 c9b7780
revert output_directory -> outdir
bfgray3 476bc9c
add back newline
bfgray3 File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Do
from __future__ import annotations
instead.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Python 3.6 hasn't hit EoL.
Besides, they are talking about deprecating that in 3.11 and removing it in 3.13. 😠
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ah 😕
Yeah, it will likely be replaced by
co_annotations
, but I haven't been following the progress closely.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We might have to do a version check here actually.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think it's safe to do a string inside this, it'll be a ForwardRef. Also,
from __future__ import annotations
wouldn't work here, this is not an annotation.https://discuss.python.org/t/type-annotations-pep-649-and-pep-563/11363 for the annotation discussion.