You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
For this project, I created a github organization called pyutils so the project can have multiple maintainers (to prevent an issue like this from happening again). I created a corresponding pypi account https://pypi.org/user/pyutils/ which might be a better choice for a multiple-owner project.
I'm not sure what the standard practice is, so let me know if either way is preferred.
Reasons for the request
As evidenced in this github thread: rkern/line_profiler#153 the project has not been maintained in months. The pip install is broken on Python 3.7, and the current owner has not responded to the issue at all.
Maintenance or replacement?
I intend to simply maintain the package as is.
EDIT: I've contacted the author and received permission to take ownership of the repo:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Project to be claimed
PROJECT_NAME
: https://pypi.org/project/line_profilerYour PyPI username
I typically release packages under my personal username:
USER_NAME
: https://pypi.org/user/pyutils/For this project, I created a github organization called pyutils so the project can have multiple maintainers (to prevent an issue like this from happening again). I created a corresponding pypi account https://pypi.org/user/pyutils/ which might be a better choice for a multiple-owner project.
If organization pypi repos are frowned upon, then I'd also be ok with using my personal account: https://pypi.org/user/Erotemic but I'd prefer to use https://pypi.org/user/pyutils/
I'm not sure what the standard practice is, so let me know if either way is preferred.
Reasons for the request
As evidenced in this github thread: rkern/line_profiler#153 the project has not been maintained in months. The pip install is broken on Python 3.7, and the current owner has not responded to the issue at all.
Maintenance or replacement?
I intend to simply maintain the package as is.
EDIT: I've contacted the author and received permission to take ownership of the repo:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: