Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

use caller's module as ID for task in task() #516

Closed
wants to merge 4 commits into from

Conversation

NickCrews
Copy link
Contributor

Closes #513

I didn't add any tests yet until I got confirmation this
is the right direction.

Changes

Provide a description and/or bullet points to describe the changes in this PR.

Todo

  • Reference issues which can be closed due to this PR with "Closes #x".
  • Review whether the documentation needs to be updated.
  • Document PR in docs/changes.rst.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 5, 2023

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (4b613df) 96.50% compared to head (a813ebe) 68.41%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #516       +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage   96.50%   68.41%   -28.09%     
===========================================
  Files         104      104               
  Lines        8920     8920               
===========================================
- Hits         8608     6103     -2505     
- Misses        312     2817     +2505     
Flag Coverage Δ
end_to_end ?
integration 40.25% <100.00%> (+0.03%) ⬆️
unit 68.12% <100.00%> (-0.40%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@tobiasraabe tobiasraabe modified the milestone: v0.4.5 Dec 6, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

BUG: using pytask.task()(func_defined_in_other_file) doesn't work
2 participants