Is this a correct way to use setup_module?

[pjyan]

sys info: platform linux -- Python 3.7.9, pytest-7.1.2, pluggy-1.0.0 -- /usr/bin/python3

Here I have two files, conftest.py and test.py

#conftest.py
@pytest.fixture(scope="session", autouse=True)
def setup_module(request):
    print('start conftest')
    yield
    print('stop conftest')

#test.py
class Test():
    @classmethod
    def setup_class(cls):
        print('setup class')
    def test_func(self):
        pass

after running pytest， here is the output：

test.py::Test::test_func start conftest
setup class
PASSEDstop conftest

start conftest is after test.py::Test::test_func, it seems like the function setup_module is running after cheking the test_func
In my mind. the output is supposed to be something list that

start conftest
...
test.py::Test::test_func 
setup class
PASSED
...
stop conftest

[RonnyPfannschmidt]

its not clear what you are asking for, setup_moduleas per xunit would be a module level function

your example has a fixture using that name while being session scoped

a xunit style setup method would be defined in the module where it is wanted

a fixture doesnt need to use the xunit names

these days using fixtures is recommended over using xunit methods

[pjyan]

Hi, thanks a lot.
I find the problem -- mix using fixture and xunit names, which is not necessary