Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

bpo-46111: Fix unittest tests in optimized mode #30163

Merged

Conversation

serhiy-storchaka
Copy link
Member

@serhiy-storchaka serhiy-storchaka commented Dec 17, 2021

@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks @serhiy-storchaka for the PR 🌮🎉.. I'm working now to backport this PR to: 3.9, 3.10.
🐍🍒⛏🤖

@serhiy-storchaka serhiy-storchaka deleted the test_unittest-optimized branch December 17, 2021 09:11
miss-islington pushed a commit to miss-islington/cpython that referenced this pull request Dec 17, 2021
(cherry picked from commit 95a922b)

Co-authored-by: Serhiy Storchaka <storchaka@gmail.com>
@bedevere-bot
Copy link

GH-30164 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.10 branch.

@bedevere-bot bedevere-bot removed the needs backport to 3.10 only security fixes label Dec 17, 2021
miss-islington pushed a commit to miss-islington/cpython that referenced this pull request Dec 17, 2021
(cherry picked from commit 95a922b)

Co-authored-by: Serhiy Storchaka <storchaka@gmail.com>
@bedevere-bot
Copy link

GH-30165 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.9 branch.

@bedevere-bot bedevere-bot removed the needs backport to 3.9 only security fixes label Dec 17, 2021
miss-islington added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 17, 2021
(cherry picked from commit 95a922b)

Co-authored-by: Serhiy Storchaka <storchaka@gmail.com>
miss-islington added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 17, 2021
(cherry picked from commit 95a922b)

Co-authored-by: Serhiy Storchaka <storchaka@gmail.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
skip news tests Tests in the Lib/test dir
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants