Add re.VERBOSE flag documentation example #97678
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
All commit authors signed the Contributor License Agreement. |
Doc/library/re.rst
Outdated
Comment on lines
786
to
787
| or within tokens like ``*?``, ``(?:`` or ``(?P<...>`` (e.g. ``(? :`` or ``* | ||
| ?``). |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
It would be clearer to say something like "For example, (? : and * ? are not allowed."
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks for the review :)
Fixed as suggested.
The current re.VERBOSE documentation example leaves space for ambiguous interpretation. One may read that spaces within the `(?:` token are spaces inside the non-capturing group (such as `(?: )`). This patch removes the ambiguity by including examples after the statement.
athos-ribeiro
force-pushed
the
re-verbose-docs
branch
from
cf623b3
to
5861f53
Compare
JelleZijlstra
added
needs backport to 3.10
|
Thanks @athos-ribeiro for the PR, and @JelleZijlstra for merging it 🌮🎉.. I'm working now to backport this PR to: 3.10, 3.11. |
JelleZijlstra
added
needs backport to 3.10
|
Thanks @athos-ribeiro for the PR, and @JelleZijlstra for merging it 🌮🎉.. I'm working now to backport this PR to: 3.11. |
|
Thanks @athos-ribeiro for the PR, and @JelleZijlstra for merging it 🌮🎉.. I'm working now to backport this PR to: 3.10. |
|
GH-97882 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.11 branch. |
miss-islington
pushed a commit
to miss-islington/cpython
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 5, 2022
The current re.VERBOSE documentation example leaves space for ambiguous interpretation. One may read that spaces within the `(?:` token are spaces inside the non-capturing group (such as `(?: )`). This patch removes the ambiguity by including examples after the statement. (cherry picked from commit 0ceafa7) Co-authored-by: Athos Ribeiro <athoscribeiro@gmail.com>
|
GH-97883 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.10 branch. |
miss-islington
pushed a commit
to miss-islington/cpython
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 5, 2022
The current re.VERBOSE documentation example leaves space for ambiguous interpretation. One may read that spaces within the `(?:` token are spaces inside the non-capturing group (such as `(?: )`). This patch removes the ambiguity by including examples after the statement. (cherry picked from commit 0ceafa7) Co-authored-by: Athos Ribeiro <athoscribeiro@gmail.com>
miss-islington
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 5, 2022
The current re.VERBOSE documentation example leaves space for ambiguous interpretation. One may read that spaces within the `(?:` token are spaces inside the non-capturing group (such as `(?: )`). This patch removes the ambiguity by including examples after the statement. (cherry picked from commit 0ceafa7) Co-authored-by: Athos Ribeiro <athoscribeiro@gmail.com>
miss-islington
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 5, 2022
The current re.VERBOSE documentation example leaves space for ambiguous interpretation. One may read that spaces within the `(?:` token are spaces inside the non-capturing group (such as `(?: )`). This patch removes the ambiguity by including examples after the statement. (cherry picked from commit 0ceafa7) Co-authored-by: Athos Ribeiro <athoscribeiro@gmail.com>
carljm
added a commit
to carljm/cpython
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 6, 2022
* main: (66 commits) pythongh-65961: Raise `DeprecationWarning` when `__package__` differs from `__spec__.parent` (python#97879) docs(typing): add "see PEP 675" to LiteralString (python#97926) pythongh-97850: Remove all known instances of module_repr() (python#97876) I changed my surname early this year (python#96671) pythongh-93738: Documentation C syntax (:c:type:<C type> -> :c:expr:<C type>) (python#97768) pythongh-91539: improve performance of get_proxies_environment (python#91566) build(deps): bump actions/stale from 5 to 6 (python#97701) pythonGH-95172 Make the same version `versionadded` oneline (python#95172) pythongh-88050: Fix asyncio subprocess to kill process cleanly when process is blocked (python#32073) pythongh-93738: Documentation C syntax (Function glob patterns -> literal markup) (python#97774) pythongh-93357: Port test cases to IsolatedAsyncioTestCase, part 2 (python#97896) pythongh-95196: Disable incorrect pickling of the C implemented classmethod descriptors (pythonGH-96383) pythongh-97758: Fix a crash in getpath_joinpath() called without arguments (pythonGH-97759) pythongh-74696: Pass root_dir to custom archivers which support it (pythonGH-94251) pythongh-97661: Improve accuracy of sqlite3.Cursor.fetchone docs (python#97662) pythongh-87092: bring compiler code closer to a preprocessing-opt-assembler organisation (pythonGH-97644) pythonGH-96704: Add {Task,Handle}.get_context(), use it in call_exception_handler() (python#96756) pythongh-93738: Documentation C syntax (:c:type:`PyTypeObject*` -> :c:expr:`PyTypeObject*`) (python#97778) pythongh-97825: fix AttributeError when calling subprocess.check_output(input=None) with encoding or errors args (python#97826) Add re.VERBOSE flag documentation example (python#97678) ...
mpage
pushed a commit
to mpage/cpython
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 11, 2022
The current re.VERBOSE documentation example leaves space for ambiguous interpretation. One may read that spaces within the `(?:` token are spaces inside the non-capturing group (such as `(?: )`). This patch removes the ambiguity by including examples after the statement.
pablogsal
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 22, 2022
The current re.VERBOSE documentation example leaves space for ambiguous interpretation. One may read that spaces within the `(?:` token are spaces inside the non-capturing group (such as `(?: )`). This patch removes the ambiguity by including examples after the statement. (cherry picked from commit 0ceafa7) Co-authored-by: Athos Ribeiro <athoscribeiro@gmail.com>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The current re.VERBOSE documentation example leaves space for ambiguous interpretation. One may read that spaces within the
(?:token are spaces inside the non-capturing group (such as(?: )). This patch removes the ambiguity by including examples after the statement.