Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Keyword arguments in index (PEP-0472 revisited) [WIP] #1579

Closed

Conversation

stefanoborini
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@the-knights-who-say-ni
Copy link

Hello, and thanks for your contribution!

I'm a bot set up to make sure that the project can legally accept this contribution by verifying everyone involved has signed the PSF contributor agreement (CLA).

Recognized GitHub username

We couldn't find a bugs.python.org (b.p.o) account corresponding to the following GitHub usernames:

@stefanoborini

This might be simply due to a missing "GitHub Name" entry in one's b.p.o account settings. This is necessary for legal reasons before we can look at this contribution. Please follow the steps outlined in the CPython devguide to rectify this issue.

You can check yourself to see if the CLA has been received.

Thanks again for the contribution, we look forward to reviewing it!

@stefanoborini
Copy link
Contributor Author

stefanoborini commented Sep 1, 2020

The CLA. it will be signed tonight.

Ni!

pep-9999.txt Show resolved Hide resolved
pep-9999.txt Show resolved Hide resolved
@brettcannon
Copy link
Member

FYI we prefer that WIP PEPs be done in a user's personal fork to keep traffic in this repo down (i.e. the PEP editors watch this repo and get pinged on every comment). So if this PEP is not ready for acceptance I would please ask that this PR be closed and you open a new one once you're ready to have your PR considered for merging.

@gvanrossum
Copy link
Member

Closing. See Brett's comment.

@gvanrossum gvanrossum closed this Sep 1, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants