Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Re-organize the backward split code generation #1871

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

q10
Copy link
Contributor

@q10 q10 commented Jul 11, 2023

Summary:

  • Move the determination of kMaxVecsPerThread and kThreadGroupSize in embedding_backward_split_template.cu into its own macro

  • Update embedding_backward_split_template.cu to hardcode values for kMaxVecsPerThread and kThreadGroupSize for the experimental optimizers case

Reviewed By: sryap

Differential Revision: D47354614

Summary:
- Move the determination of `kMaxVecsPerThread` and `kThreadGroupSize` in `embedding_backward_split_template.cu` into its own macro

- Update `embedding_backward_split_template.cu` to hardcode values for kMaxVecsPerThread and kThreadGroupSize for the experimental optimizers case

Reviewed By: sryap

Differential Revision: D47354614

fbshipit-source-id: d12c1b7a8cd0efe61f553a5101c89f2d407abef1
@netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented Jul 11, 2023

Deploy Preview for pytorch-fbgemm-docs canceled.

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 3398f49
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/pytorch-fbgemm-docs/deploys/64adadc317d1fa0008082efa

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D47354614

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request has been merged in eea19e8.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants