New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Modify Pipe to return an RRef. #47829
Modify Pipe to return an RRef. #47829
Conversation
As per proposal in #44827, the API needs to return an RRef to support inter-host pipelining. For now, we just return a local RRef and only support pipeline on a single host. But having this change in the API upfront ensures we don't make any BC breaking changes later. Differential Revision: [D24914022](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D24914022/) [ghstack-poisoned]
As per proposal in #44827, the API needs to return an RRef to support inter-host pipelining. For now, we just return a local RRef and only support pipeline on a single host. But having this change in the API upfront ensures we don't make any BC breaking changes later. Differential Revision: [D24914022](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D24914022/) ghstack-source-id: 116499310 Pull Request resolved: #47829
💊 CI failures summary and remediationsAs of commit d03229f (more details on the Dr. CI page): 💚 💚 Looks good so far! There are no failures yet. 💚 💚 This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI (expand for details).Follow this link to opt-out of these comments for your Pull Requests.Please report bugs/suggestions to the (internal) Dr. CI Users group. This comment has been revised 41 times. |
import tempfile | ||
|
||
@pytest.fixture | ||
def setup_rpc(scope="session"): |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks like this function isn't used?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's actually used as part of input to the test fixtures (ex: test_1to3).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM, although there are lint errors.
As per proposal in #44827, the API needs to return an RRef to support inter-host pipelining. For now, we just return a local RRef and only support pipeline on a single host. But having this change in the API upfront ensures we don't make any BC breaking changes later. Differential Revision: [D24914022](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D24914022/) [ghstack-poisoned]
Pull Request resolved: #47829 As per proposal in #44827, the API needs to return an RRef to support inter-host pipelining. For now, we just return a local RRef and only support pipeline on a single host. But having this change in the API upfront ensures we don't make any BC breaking changes later. ghstack-source-id: 117361908 Differential Revision: [D24914022](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D24914022/)
As per proposal in #44827, the API needs to return an RRef to support inter-host pipelining. For now, we just return a local RRef and only support pipeline on a single host. But having this change in the API upfront ensures we don't make any BC breaking changes later. Differential Revision: [D24914022](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D24914022/) [ghstack-poisoned]
Pull Request resolved: #47829 As per proposal in #44827, the API needs to return an RRef to support inter-host pipelining. For now, we just return a local RRef and only support pipeline on a single host. But having this change in the API upfront ensures we don't make any BC breaking changes later. ghstack-source-id: 117378144 Differential Revision: [D24914022](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D24914022/)
As per proposal in #44827, the API needs to return an RRef to support inter-host pipelining. For now, we just return a local RRef and only support pipeline on a single host. But having this change in the API upfront ensures we don't make any BC breaking changes later. Differential Revision: [D24914022](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D24914022/) [ghstack-poisoned]
Pull Request resolved: #47829 As per proposal in #44827, the API needs to return an RRef to support inter-host pipelining. For now, we just return a local RRef and only support pipeline on a single host. But having this change in the API upfront ensures we don't make any BC breaking changes later. ghstack-source-id: 117494044 Differential Revision: [D24914022](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D24914022/)
As per proposal in #44827, the API needs to return an RRef to support inter-host pipelining. For now, we just return a local RRef and only support pipeline on a single host. But having this change in the API upfront ensures we don't make any BC breaking changes later. Differential Revision: [D24914022](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D24914022/) [ghstack-poisoned]
Pull Request resolved: #47829 As per proposal in #44827, the API needs to return an RRef to support inter-host pipelining. For now, we just return a local RRef and only support pipeline on a single host. But having this change in the API upfront ensures we don't make any BC breaking changes later. ghstack-source-id: 118064022 Differential Revision: [D24914022](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D24914022/)
As per proposal in #44827, the API needs to return an RRef to support inter-host pipelining. For now, we just return a local RRef and only support pipeline on a single host. But having this change in the API upfront ensures we don't make any BC breaking changes later. Differential Revision: [D24914022](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D24914022/) [ghstack-poisoned]
Pull Request resolved: #47829 As per proposal in #44827, the API needs to return an RRef to support inter-host pipelining. For now, we just return a local RRef and only support pipeline on a single host. But having this change in the API upfront ensures we don't make any BC breaking changes later. ghstack-source-id: 118252711 Differential Revision: [D24914022](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D24914022/)
As per proposal in #44827, the API needs to return an RRef to support inter-host pipelining. For now, we just return a local RRef and only support pipeline on a single host. But having this change in the API upfront ensures we don't make any BC breaking changes later. Differential Revision: [D24914022](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D24914022/) [ghstack-poisoned]
As per proposal in #44827, the API needs to return an RRef to support inter-host pipelining. For now, we just return a local RRef and only support pipeline on a single host. But having this change in the API upfront ensures we don't make any BC breaking changes later. Differential Revision: [D24914022](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D24914022/) [ghstack-poisoned]
Stack from ghstack:
As per proposal in #44827,
the API needs to return an RRef to support inter-host pipelining.
For now, we just return a local RRef and only support pipeline on a single
host. But having this change in the API upfront ensures we don't make any BC
breaking changes later.
Differential Revision: D24914022