Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add new weights for wide_resnet101_2 model #4906

Merged

Conversation

prabhat00155
Copy link
Contributor

@prabhat00155 prabhat00155 commented Nov 10, 2021

Fixes partially #3995

torchrun --nproc_per_node=1 train.py --test-only --weights ImageNet1K_RefV2 --model wide_resnet101_2 -b 1
Acc@1 82.492 Acc@5 96.110

cc @datumbox @bjuncek

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link

facebook-github-bot commented Nov 10, 2021

💊 CI failures summary and remediations

As of commit 5fdabd4 (more details on the Dr. CI page):


  • 1/1 failures introduced in this PR

1 failure not recognized by patterns:

Job Step Action
CircleCI binary_libtorchvision_ops_android Build 🔁 rerun

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI (expand for details).

Please report bugs/suggestions to the (internal) Dr. CI Users group.

Click here to manually regenerate this comment.

Copy link
Contributor

@datumbox datumbox left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, thanks!

@datumbox datumbox merged commit 348f75c into pytorch:main Nov 11, 2021
cyyever pushed a commit to cyyever/vision that referenced this pull request Nov 16, 2021
* Add new weights for wide_resnet101_2 model

* Updated accuracies

Co-authored-by: Vasilis Vryniotis <datumbox@users.noreply.github.com>
facebook-github-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 17, 2021
Summary:
* Add new weights for wide_resnet101_2 model

* Updated accuracies

Reviewed By: datumbox

Differential Revision: D32470481

fbshipit-source-id: 145391d20ca8c6da3cee44239a1df93eb350d733

Co-authored-by: Vasilis Vryniotis <datumbox@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants