Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Put back previous tolerance for test_classification and test_video #7202

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 9, 2023

Conversation

NicolasHug
Copy link
Member

@NicolasHug NicolasHug commented Feb 9, 2023

This reverts #6380 which was identified to be the cause of various recent failures #7114 (comment).

This PR fixes the current model failures for video and classification (except for this weird cuda-vit_h_14 failure which is tracked in #7143.
EDIT: there's still a failure for resnet101 as well

I'll submit another PR for the detection model and mark them as flaky (like what #7130 already does)

Like all of those quick-fix PRs, this one is less than ideal. It's just a patch over an already messy situation. In the (hopefully near) future, we should focus on more robust changes like the one proposed in #7130

cc @pmeier

@NicolasHug NicolasHug changed the title Revert 6380 for test_classification and test_video Put back previous tolerance for test_classification and test_video Feb 9, 2023
@NicolasHug NicolasHug marked this pull request as ready for review February 9, 2023 09:32
Copy link
Collaborator

@pmeier pmeier left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM if CI is green-ish again. Thanks Nicolas! Just to make sure: #6380 changed the precision on three tests, but here we are only reverting two of them. Meaning, test_quantized_classification_model is fine with the stricter tolerance?

@NicolasHug
Copy link
Member Author

Yes, I'm not seeing failures for the quantized models, so it looks like tightening that tolerance was OK

@NicolasHug NicolasHug merged commit 539c6e2 into pytorch:main Feb 9, 2023
@NicolasHug NicolasHug added module: tests revert(ed) For reverted PRs, and PRs that revert other PRs labels Feb 9, 2023
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 9, 2023

Hey @NicolasHug!

You merged this PR, but no labels were added. The list of valid labels is available at https://github.com/pytorch/vision/blob/main/.github/process_commit.py

facebook-github-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 28, 2023
…_video (#7202)

Reviewed By: vmoens

Differential Revision: D44416276

fbshipit-source-id: 40ce41797c05765010a401abaaf46d845207750a
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
cla signed module: tests revert(ed) For reverted PRs, and PRs that revert other PRs
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants