You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Aug 6, 2022. It is now read-only.
I feel like we should add to the end of this section a sample question of the form: is this vector a linear combination of these other ones? Or maybe move that chunk from the next section to this one.
Or what about saying at the end: A basic kind of problem we will want to understand is whether a given vector is a linear combination of some other vectors. As we will see, this question is closely related to the problem of solving linear systems!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Wait, I think we should do this at the end of 3.1. It motivates the whole idea of a vector equation at the start of 3.2. That way they will have actually seen one instead of just being told they should care about vector equations.
Actually, I think our motivation for vector equations is backwards. We care that we can translate a linear system into a vector equation, not the other way around. So perhaps add a paragraph at the end of 3.1 to show this, and have essentially the same paragraph at the beginning of 3.2? Then that motivates why we care about linear combinations.
In reference to version 30f811f
I feel like we should add to the end of this section a sample question of the form: is this vector a linear combination of these other ones? Or maybe move that chunk from the next section to this one.
Or what about saying at the end: A basic kind of problem we will want to understand is whether a given vector is a linear combination of some other vectors. As we will see, this question is closely related to the problem of solving linear systems!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: