Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Wireguard support for Surfshark #587

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 26, 2022
Merged

Wireguard support for Surfshark #587

merged 1 commit into from
Aug 26, 2022

Conversation

qdm12
Copy link
Owner

@qdm12 qdm12 commented Aug 23, 2021

No description provided.

@HarryWindsor
Copy link

Any updates when this will be merged?

@qdm12 qdm12 force-pushed the master branch 2 times, most recently from 75a690c to bda6707 Compare June 12, 2022 01:15
@qdm12
Copy link
Owner Author

qdm12 commented Jun 30, 2022

Sorry for the delay answering.

There is a major refactoring I have to do in order to optionally allow network traffic to the needed API to get keys etc, before the vpn is up. And also another rather large refactoring to support renewing keys periodically. All this will likely take months I'm not gonna lie, but it's definitely on my list, especially the first one since several providers need API communication before the tunnel is up (which sucks but anyway that's how it is).

@qdm12 qdm12 merged commit 5989f29 into master Aug 26, 2022
@qdm12 qdm12 deleted the surfshark-wireguard branch August 26, 2022 14:55
EkilDeew pushed a commit to EkilDeew/gluetun that referenced this pull request Nov 10, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants