Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Deprecate NotA and provide alternatives #137

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jun 20, 2024

Conversation

timvisee
Copy link
Member

Deprecate the NotA type which was rather confusing.

This provides better alternatives for functions that were using this.

All Submissions:

  • Contributions should target the dev branch. Did you create your branch from dev?
  • Have you followed the guidelines in our Contributing document?
  • Have you checked to ensure there aren't other open Pull Requests for the same update/change?

New Feature Submissions:

  1. Does your submission pass tests?
  2. Have you formatted your code locally using cargo +nightly fmt --all command prior to submission?
  3. Have you checked your code using cargo clippy --all --all-features command?

@timvisee timvisee merged commit 155d067 into v1-10-upgrade Jun 20, 2024
2 checks passed
timvisee added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 26, 2024
* Deprecate NotA type

* Improve documentation for extraction functions

* Fix doctest
timvisee added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 26, 2024
* Deprecate NotA type

* Improve documentation for extraction functions

* Fix doctest
timvisee added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 27, 2024
* Deprecate NotA type

* Improve documentation for extraction functions

* Fix doctest
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants