Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature idea: multiple Panda robot in the same environment #22

Closed
meinczingerm opened this issue Apr 2, 2022 · 2 comments
Closed

Feature idea: multiple Panda robot in the same environment #22

meinczingerm opened this issue Apr 2, 2022 · 2 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@meinczingerm
Copy link

I am currently implementing an environment similar to the cable insertion task presented in https://arxiv.org/pdf/2112.00597.pdf, but I have an issue that I can not add and control more than 1 Panda robot at the same time. I managed to resolve this issue in a hacky way, but since it is fairly simple to solve and could be useful for others I wanted to create this issue.

The problem is caused by the same body_name="panda" of all added robot:
This could simply be fixed by passing an ID or something which could be added at the end of the body_name.

It would be also nice to pass a robot orientation similar to base_position, so the robots can be placed with different orientation.

@meinczingerm meinczingerm added the question Further information is requested label Apr 2, 2022
@qgallouedec qgallouedec added enhancement New feature or request and removed question Further information is requested labels Apr 4, 2022
@qgallouedec
Copy link
Owner

qgallouedec commented Apr 4, 2022

That sounds like an interesting enhancement.

Can you open a draft PR with your fixes, and post a code example to create an environment with two robots ?
How do you handle the action space ? And the observation space ?

The task part should not be a problem because the task and the robot are independent.

@meinczingerm
Copy link
Author

I created a PR: #23

This is my first contribution so feel free to give me any feedbacks.

@qgallouedec qgallouedec linked a pull request Apr 4, 2022 that will close this issue
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants