Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Unification of all test-framework-related options #791

Draft
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

fedinskiy
Copy link
Contributor

@fedinskiy fedinskiy commented May 24, 2023

Summary

Since all of them are now gathered in one place
it would become easier to monitor and document them
Required for potential automation of #369
Future changes in test suite require accommodation of #309

Please check the relevant options

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Dependency update
  • Refactoring
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • This change requires a documentation update
  • This change requires execution against OCP (use run tests phrase in comment)

Checklist:

  • Example scenarios has been updated / added
  • Methods and classes used in PR scenarios are meaningful
  • Commits are well encapsulated and follow the best practices

@fedinskiy
Copy link
Contributor Author

run tests

@fedinskiy fedinskiy force-pushed the feature/properties-unification branch 5 times, most recently from a7c6afa to 37a5005 Compare May 29, 2023 07:02
@fedinskiy fedinskiy force-pushed the feature/properties-unification branch 2 times, most recently from 70fd173 to 61233bd Compare July 24, 2023 13:18
@fedinskiy
Copy link
Contributor Author

run tests

@fedinskiy fedinskiy force-pushed the feature/properties-unification branch from 61233bd to 7b85220 Compare July 26, 2023 08:25
@fedinskiy
Copy link
Contributor Author

run tests

@fedinskiy fedinskiy force-pushed the feature/properties-unification branch from 7b85220 to bf6a131 Compare July 31, 2023 06:12
@mocenas
Copy link
Contributor

mocenas commented Oct 31, 2023

Is this PR still active / relevant @fedinskiy ?

@fedinskiy
Copy link
Contributor Author

@mocenas this MR is relevant, but not very active.

@fedinskiy fedinskiy force-pushed the feature/properties-unification branch 2 times, most recently from 2564ceb to 8f7a931 Compare March 20, 2024 14:14
@fedinskiy
Copy link
Contributor Author

run tests

1 similar comment
@fedinskiy
Copy link
Contributor Author

run tests

@QuarkusQE
Copy link
Contributor

Can one of the admins verify this patch?

@rsvoboda
Copy link
Member

@mjurc @michalvavrik @fedinskiy what about this effort?

@michalvavrik
Copy link
Member

@mjurc @michalvavrik @fedinskiy what about this effort?

framework has changed a little, I think it requires additional work and I doubt @fedinskiy has time for it; let's hear from him

@fedinskiy
Copy link
Contributor Author

I am working on this, when I have time, lately I didn't have any. Are we in a hurry with this?

@rsvoboda
Copy link
Member

I was just wondering if this is abandoned or still on radar.

@fedinskiy fedinskiy force-pushed the feature/properties-unification branch from 8f7a931 to 7f1cffe Compare July 26, 2024 12:22
Since all of them are now gathered in one place
it would become easier to monitor and document them
Required for potential automation of quarkus-qe#369
@fedinskiy fedinskiy force-pushed the feature/properties-unification branch from 7f1cffe to e4071fa Compare July 29, 2024 06:56
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants