Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Removing deprecated BuildStep.applicationArchiveMarkers() #17018

Merged

Conversation

aloubyansky
Copy link
Member

Quoting the javadoc This method will be removed at some point post Quarkus 1.1.

@quarkus-bot quarkus-bot bot added the area/core label May 5, 2021
Copy link
Member

@gsmet gsmet left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice cleanup!

@gsmet gsmet added the triage/waiting-for-ci Ready to merge when CI successfully finishes label May 5, 2021
@quarkus-bot
Copy link

quarkus-bot bot commented May 5, 2021

This workflow status is outdated as a new workflow run has been triggered.

Failing Jobs - Building 067d7f0

Status Name Step Test failures Logs Raw logs
JVM Tests - JDK 11 Build Test failures Logs Raw logs
JVM Tests - JDK 11 Windows Build ⚠️ Check → Logs Raw logs
✔️ JVM Tests - JDK 15

Full information is available in the Build summary check run.

Test Failures

⚙️ JVM Tests - JDK 11 #

📦 extensions/scheduler/deployment

io.quarkus.scheduler.test.PausedMethodExpressionTest.testSchedulerPauseMethod line 40 - More details - Source on GitHub

@aloubyansky aloubyansky force-pushed the BuildStep-applicationArchiveMarkers branch from 067d7f0 to cb35a56 Compare May 5, 2021 19:26
@aloubyansky aloubyansky merged commit 62af67c into quarkusio:main May 6, 2021
@quarkus-bot quarkus-bot bot added this to the 2.0 - main milestone May 6, 2021
@quarkus-bot quarkus-bot bot removed the triage/waiting-for-ci Ready to merge when CI successfully finishes label May 6, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants