Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Exemption from congestion control #248

Closed
martinthomson opened this issue Jan 30, 2017 · 0 comments
Closed

Exemption from congestion control #248

martinthomson opened this issue Jan 30, 2017 · 0 comments
Labels
-recovery -transport design An issue that affects the design of the protocol; resolution requires consensus. has-consensus An issue that the Chairs have determined has consensus, by canvassing the mailing list.
Milestone
First Implementat...

Comments

@martinthomson
Copy link
Member

The current transport doc exempts stream 1 from congestion control. That seems to be unnecessary, potentially hard to implement, and maybe even dangerous.
@martinthomson martinthomson added design An issue that affects the design of the protocol; resolution requires consensus. -transport labels Jan 30, 2017
@MikeBishop MikeBishop mentioned this issue Feb 8, 2017
Closed
@martinthomson martinthomson mentioned this issue Mar 10, 2017
Closed
@janaiyengar janaiyengar added the needs-discussion An issue that needs more discussion before we can resolve it. label Mar 11, 2017
@martinthomson martinthomson removed the needs-discussion An issue that needs more discussion before we can resolve it. label Apr 27, 2017
martinthomson added a commit that referenced this issue Apr 27, 2017
@martinthomson
Don't exempt stream 1 from congestion control
1af351a 
Closes #248
@martinthomson martinthomson mentioned this issue Apr 27, 2017
Merged
@mnot mnot added this to Reliability in QUIC Apr 28, 2017
martinthomson added a commit that referenced this issue May 3, 2017
@martinthomson
Don't exempt stream 1 from congestion control
2c39995 
Closes #248
@martinthomson martinthomson removed this from Reliability in QUIC May 4, 2017
@mnot mnot added the has-consensus An issue that the Chairs have determined has consensus, by canvassing the mailing list. label Sep 26, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
-recovery -transport design An issue that affects the design of the protocol; resolution requires consensus. has-consensus An issue that the Chairs have determined has consensus, by canvassing the mailing list.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
First Implementation Draft Candidate
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

Stream1 is not that special quicwg/base-drafts
4 participants
@martinthomson @mnot @janaiyengar @ianswett