Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

"1-RTT packet" is defined nowhere #4397

Closed
kazuho opened this issue Nov 19, 2020 · 0 comments · Fixed by #4407
Closed

"1-RTT packet" is defined nowhere #4397

kazuho opened this issue Nov 19, 2020 · 0 comments · Fixed by #4407
Labels
-transport editorial An issue that does not affect the design of the protocol; does not require consensus. ietf-lc An issue that was raised during IETF Last Call.

Comments

@kazuho
Copy link
Member

kazuho commented Nov 19, 2020

While the transport draft talks a lot about "1-RTT packets", the term is not defined. We also have a sentence that seem to imply that a long-header variant of 1-RTT packets might exist (https://quicwg.org/base-drafts/draft-ietf-quic-transport.html#section-7.1-4).

We refer to the packet less frequently as "short header packets" or "packet with a short header."

As a resolution, I think we might want to change the title of section 17.3 from "Short Header Packets" to "1-RTT Packets". Rest of the text can remain the same, as the first sentence of that section says that it is the only type of short header packet that we define.

@larseggert larseggert added -transport ietf-lc An issue that was raised during IETF Last Call. labels Nov 20, 2020
@LPardue LPardue added the editorial An issue that does not affect the design of the protocol; does not require consensus. label Nov 24, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
-transport editorial An issue that does not affect the design of the protocol; does not require consensus. ietf-lc An issue that was raised during IETF Last Call.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants