"1-RTT packet" is defined nowhere #4397
Labels
-transport
editorial
An issue that does not affect the design of the protocol; does not require consensus.
ietf-lc
An issue that was raised during IETF Last Call.
While the transport draft talks a lot about "1-RTT packets", the term is not defined. We also have a sentence that seem to imply that a long-header variant of 1-RTT packets might exist (https://quicwg.org/base-drafts/draft-ietf-quic-transport.html#section-7.1-4).
We refer to the packet less frequently as "short header packets" or "packet with a short header."
As a resolution, I think we might want to change the title of section 17.3 from "Short Header Packets" to "1-RTT Packets". Rest of the text can remain the same, as the first sentence of that section says that it is the only type of short header packet that we define.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: