Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

qcram: section reference format #1112

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 21, 2018
Merged

qcram: section reference format #1112

merged 1 commit into from
Feb 21, 2018

Conversation

reschke
Copy link
Contributor

@reschke reschke commented Feb 15, 2018

No description provided.

@@ -362,7 +362,7 @@ the number of concurrently blocked streams.

### Fixed overhead.

HPACK defines overhead as 32 bytes ({{!RFC7541}} Section 4.1). As described
HPACK defines overhead as 32 bytes ({{!RFC7541}}, Section 4.1). As described
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is there a consistent format we should use for references to RFC7541? Or it's ok that one is 'see Section X.Y of' and the other is ', Section X.Y'?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I have been using "Section X.Y of {{CITATION}}" always. The other acceptable form is "{{CITATION}}, Section X.Y", but there is value in consistency.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

...depends on context. The first form works a bit better in prose, the second one in parentheses. IMHO.

@@ -103,7 +103,7 @@ PUSH_PROMISE frames (see {{hq-frames}}).
If a header block contains no vulnerable header fields, BLOCKING MUST be 0.
This implies that the header fields are represented either as references
to dynamic table entries which are known to have been received, or as
Literal header fields (see {{RFC7541}} Section 6.2).
Literal header fields (see Section 6.2 of {{RFC7541}} ).
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is there an extraneous space before ) ?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yes

@afrind afrind merged commit 1eeacb5 into quicwg:master Feb 21, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants