Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

HTTP: make few minor stylistic improvements #2127

Conversation

dtikhonov
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

Copy link
Contributor

@MikeBishop MikeBishop left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm fine with the removal of the "However," but I'm not convinced the other two are improvements.

confusion as servers could not reliably identify which elements of the priority
tree could safely be discarded. Clients could potentially reference closed
in describing the relative priority of requests. This created
confusion as servers could not identify reliably which elements of the priority
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think this is placed correctly, and I feel like the change reads awkwardly.

tree could safely be discarded. Clients could potentially reference closed
in describing the relative priority of requests. This created
confusion as servers could not identify reliably which elements of the priority
tree could be safely discarded. Clients could potentially reference closed
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think you're right that this ought to move, but I think "could be discarded safely" reads better than either.

@MikeBishop MikeBishop merged commit 7b51c2b into quicwg:master Dec 12, 2018
@martinthomson martinthomson added editorial An issue that does not affect the design of the protocol; does not require consensus. -http labels Dec 13, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
-http editorial An issue that does not affect the design of the protocol; does not require consensus.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants