-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 205
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Changelog for transport-23 #3019
Conversation
- Explanation of the effect of Retry on 0-RTT packets (#2842, #2852) | ||
- Cryptographic handshake needs to provide server transport parameter encryption | ||
(#2920, #2921) | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Moved ACK generation guidance from recovery draft to transport draft (#1860, #2916). |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Not a comprehensive review. If I remember correctly, some other items were part of draft-22 as well.
draft-ietf-quic-transport.md
Outdated
@@ -5935,6 +5935,38 @@ DecodePacketNumber(largest_pn, truncated_pn, pn_nbits): | |||
|
|||
Issue and pull request numbers are listed with a leading octothorp. | |||
|
|||
## Since draft-ietf-quic-transport-22 | |||
|
|||
- NEW_CONNECTION_ID includes a request to retire old connection IDs (#2645, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That was already part of draft-22.
draft-ietf-quic-transport.md
Outdated
- Clarified use of CONNECTION_CLOSE in Handshake packets (#2151, #2541, #2688) | ||
- Discourage regressions of largest acknowledged in ACK (#2205, #2752) | ||
- Improved robusness of validation process for ECN counts (#2534, #2752) | ||
- Introduce concept of handshake confirmation (#2267, #2673) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This as well.
Thanks @marten-seemann, I mistyped the date when I searched and didn't check for duplicates on that set. |
Someone already did TLS for me.
I put the major wire-format change first. ekr likes the idea of marking such things as "special", but I don't subscribe to that theory. This is all important.