Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Changelog for transport-23 #3019

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Sep 12, 2019
Merged

Changelog for transport-23 #3019

merged 3 commits into from
Sep 12, 2019

Conversation

martinthomson
Copy link
Member

Someone already did TLS for me.

I put the major wire-format change first. ekr likes the idea of marking such things as "special", but I don't subscribe to that theory. This is all important.

@martinthomson martinthomson added editorial An issue that does not affect the design of the protocol; does not require consensus. -transport labels Sep 11, 2019
- Explanation of the effect of Retry on 0-RTT packets (#2842, #2852)
- Cryptographic handshake needs to provide server transport parameter encryption
(#2920, #2921)

Copy link
Contributor

@janaiyengar janaiyengar Sep 11, 2019

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
Moved ACK generation guidance from recovery draft to transport draft (#1860, #2916).

Copy link
Contributor

@marten-seemann marten-seemann left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Not a comprehensive review. If I remember correctly, some other items were part of draft-22 as well.

@@ -5935,6 +5935,38 @@ DecodePacketNumber(largest_pn, truncated_pn, pn_nbits):

Issue and pull request numbers are listed with a leading octothorp.

## Since draft-ietf-quic-transport-22

- NEW_CONNECTION_ID includes a request to retire old connection IDs (#2645,
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That was already part of draft-22.

- Clarified use of CONNECTION_CLOSE in Handshake packets (#2151, #2541, #2688)
- Discourage regressions of largest acknowledged in ACK (#2205, #2752)
- Improved robusness of validation process for ECN counts (#2534, #2752)
- Introduce concept of handshake confirmation (#2267, #2673)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This as well.

@martinthomson
Copy link
Member Author

Thanks @marten-seemann, I mistyped the date when I searched and didn't check for duplicates on that set.

@martinthomson martinthomson merged commit e9aa25a into master Sep 12, 2019
@martinthomson martinthomson deleted the changelog-tt-23 branch September 12, 2019 01:10
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
-transport editorial An issue that does not affect the design of the protocol; does not require consensus.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants