recovery-unused-references #331
Conversation
These references are unused.
| @@ -59,12 +44,7 @@ normative: | |||
|
|
|||
| informative: | |||
|
|
|||
| RFC3782: | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Correct, but these are all relevant informative references, so I'd rather keep them. The intent is to reference them before the next version.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
In which case you're supposed to mention them somewhere in the text (otherwise idnits will give you warnings).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Good to know, in that case, can you add a TODO in the congestion control section that needs to be written to ensure I mention them there.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
You could even resolve the IDNits issue by mentioning them in the TODO. :-)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
That was sort of my hope :)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I moved these all down to the TODO section except TLP.
|
@ianswett fixed all of these. Though there appears to be a bug in kramdown-rfc2629 that causes the reference to RFC5827 to be munged. I'll open a bug for that, where I will recommend that we move that reference to text. |
|
FWIW, it's not even clear that kramdown-rfc2629 is at fault here. It's current behaviour is surprising, but I don't believe it necessary for references in figures to work. |
These references are unused.