Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove dead note from header protection section #3568

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 14, 2020
Merged

Conversation

martinthomson
Copy link
Member

Now that we require a minimum packet size, this is no longer true.

@martinthomson martinthomson added editorial An issue that does not affect the design of the protocol; does not require consensus. -tls labels Apr 8, 2020
@MikeBishop
Copy link
Contributor

Is this no longer true for the algorithms defined in the spec, or no longer true for any packet protection algorithms for any AEAD? It might be worth moving the note to the end of 5.4.1 instead.

@martinthomson martinthomson merged commit 45de5a1 into master Apr 14, 2020
@martinthomson martinthomson deleted the dead-hp-note branch April 14, 2020 22:33
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
-tls editorial An issue that does not affect the design of the protocol; does not require consensus.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants