-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 205
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
The transport parameter removes EOED #4689
Conversation
As agreed via mail. Closes #4475.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This gets the job done, with or without the suggested rewording.
@@ -1821,6 +1821,9 @@ QUIC (such as the use of TLS with TCP defined in {{!TLS13}}). A fatal | |||
unsupported_extension alert MUST be sent by an implementation that supports this | |||
extension if the extension is received when the transport is not QUIC. | |||
|
|||
Negotiating the quic_transport_parameters extension causes the EndOfEarlyData to |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Negotiating the quic_transport_parameters extension causes the EndOfEarlyData to | |
Negotiating the quic_transport_parameters extension causes the requirement to send EndOfEarlyData to |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think that the shorter phrasing is better. It's not about not having a requirement to send EOED, but a requirement to not send EOED. And, as this refers to the very next section, the fewer words expended here the better.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
For the question is whether an implementer (bot being on mind you) would be confused by the lack of "requirement to send" phrase, I tend to think that without it's still clear that you don't send EOED.
As agreed via mail.
Closes #4475.