Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

explain the recommendation pattern for supporting coexistence of multiple datagram flows #66

Closed
zaheduzzaman opened this issue Dec 6, 2021 · 0 comments
Closed

explain the recommendation pattern for supporting coexistence of multiple datagram flows #66

zaheduzzaman opened this issue Dec 6, 2021 · 0 comments

Comments

@zaheduzzaman
Copy link

Section 5.1: says

If the application needs to support the coexistence of multiple flows of datagrams, one recommended pattern is to use a variable-length integer at the beginning of the Datagram Data field.

It would be nicer if we explain why we are recommending that pattern. Some lines to capture the valuable discussion on this would be valuable.
@tfpauly tfpauly changed the title explain the recommendation pattern for supporting coexistane of multiple datagram flows explain the recommendation pattern for supporting coexistence of multiple datagram flows Dec 6, 2021
tfpauly added a commit that referenced this issue Dec 6, 2021
@tfpauly
Explain VLI demux rationale
f483022 
Closes #66
@tfpauly tfpauly mentioned this issue Dec 6, 2021
Closed
@tfpauly tfpauly closed this as completed Dec 7, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

Explain VLI demux rationale quicwg/datagram
2 participants
@tfpauly @zaheduzzaman